Wednesday, March 28, 2012

More Lies From Columbuzz

"Anyone can post information on this website and it isn't our place to moderate it, nor is it our responsibility to moderate the comments people post. If someone feels something is written about them and it is wrong, they can let us know and we will update. It is that simple"

15 comments:

Dude said...

From columbuzz:
"Columbuzz isn't that different from TheDirty.com"

Jeremy, your parents must be so proud.

Anonymous said...

“Anyone can post information on this website and it isn't our place to moderate it”
Wow…did they really type this? Do they all have amnesia? The last 2 years were not full of the “administrators” deleting posts (not inappropriate) or changing what people typed to suit themselves? I truly cannot believe they even wrote that. They would have to be complete morons to write such lies….oh wait, it’s Columbuzz. Enough said

E

Dude said...

"I truly cannot believe they even wrote that. They would have to be complete morons to write such lies….oh wait, it’s Columbuzz. Enough said"

It looks to me like a futile attempt to avoid lawsuits. Good luck with that defense, Jeremy.

Dude said...

From columbuzz:
"I think we will take the advise of a commentor and claim 'Safe Harbor' which is 'A safe harbor is a provision of a statute or a regulation that reduces or eliminates a party's liability under the law, on the condition that the party performed its actions in good faith or in compliance with defined standards.' - Wikipedia"

Hilarious. Relying on Wikipedia for legal advice? Columbuzz performed its actions in good faith or in compliance with defined standards? Funny stuff.

Dude said...

From columbuzz:
"If we don't write it, we aren't responsible for it."

I believe this is correct, but a lawyer may be able to make an argument they are partly responsible because of their selective moderation.

"Besides, we have proof of what we post."

You better have. You haven't always in the past.

"They must prove what we posted isn't true for there to be libel."

They keep saying this, but this is 100% incorrect. The plaintiff just has to prove it's libelous, and then the defendant (columbuzz) would have to prove it's true.

"And once proven true, we have recourse for their attacks on us as well."

I doubt it, but if it makes you feel better, go ahead and keep telling yourself that.

Anonymous said...

Blah blah blah blah. More hot air about Bob. Who cares?

Anonymous said...

a while back didn't they claim to be a news source? now it seems they are proud of being a rumor mill. hmmmm

Anonymous said...

It is insane to think the burden of proof is on the accused one. So, if I said someone is a serial rapist, he would have to prove that he's not? How would one prove they are not something? The accuser would have to prove that he is a serial rapist.

Anonymous said...

Imagine a world where people could make unfounded accusations without a shred of proof and refuse to take them down until the one accused could prove they were false. There would be all sorts of lies posted.

Columbuzz says all people have to do is ask for things to be removed. We see how they continue to ignore the request to remove the 365 things about Columbus list.

They say anyone can post, but we see how they censor.

The say you are anonymous, but they tell where you post from, your phone numbers etc.

Don't trust them and take what they say with a grain of salt.

Anonymous said...

Imagine a world where people could make unfounded accusations without a shred of proof and refuse to take them down until the one accused could prove they were false. There would be all sorts of lies posted.

THIS HAS BEEN HAPPENING ON COLUMBUZZ SINCE IT STARTED AND NOTHING HAS STOPPED BOB AND NATHAN! NOTHING!

Anonymous said...

True. The supposedly have "proof", but their proof is just that someone "told" them. They are either gullible (which seems likely since Bob has fallen for get rich quick schemes and buying info at Walmart), don't care as long as they get the traffic (which they have hinted about), or fail to see that those who are telling them can lie and have ulterior motives (which is also likely since they don't seem to think things through and seem to be in their own world.) I think it is a combination of all three.

Dude said...

I'm not convinced that Jeremy is Nathan Wiley. I've read some of Nathan's posts on the internet, and his style seems different than Jeremy's. Nathan is semi-literate, Jeremy not so much. Jeremy's real first name might actually be Jeremy, but I don't think "Kirtz" is his real last name. Probably a combination of Kirts and Kurtz. He probably should have used a more believable last name considering his alleged family ties, something like Klingler, Moore, Hendershot, or Wilson.

Dude said...

The funny thing is that Jeremy can't even get his fake profile on facebook right. It says he was born in 1972, graduated high school in 1984, and graduated college in 1991. Anyone else see a problem with this timeline?

Anonymous said...

We know it isn't because he was an advanced student who skipped grades.

Anonymous said...

Its ran by Bob Freeman (using his actual real name), Nathan Whiley (Calling himself Jeremy Kirtz) and Jason Burton (Calling himself "Fox Gray). How do I know this? I know 2 out of 3 of them, and I have linked all their info. Only Bob Freeman uses his real name. Nathan Wiley is a guy who everyone pretty much hates because he lives in his parents house and doesnt work for a living. Jason Burton is a dead beat dad who doesnt pay his child support, is over 10,000 Dollars behind on child support and actually has a warrant for his arrest, which is now a felony warrant... If you dont believe me, check Jennings County Police) By the way, if anyone sees Jason Burton (Aka Fox Gray) please call the police. Thank you and have a good day.