Saturday, March 5, 2011

Proof Positive that Bob is Delusional

http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=5836

Bob, a concrete "technologist", compares himself to Gandhi, Einstein, Churchill, etc.  Truly unbelievable.

53 comments:

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

I wonder if Bob thinks he has tiger's blood and Adonis DNA like Charlie Sheen.

Give us a Break Freeman said...

Only Narcissist Bob would try and wear being sued as a hero's badge.

Call a Doctor said...

Obviously, Bobby has misplaced his medication.

Anonymous said...

Just like the B&W television and AM radio so goes Bob. Bye bye Bob! Do you have the number for a homeless shelter, you may need it.

Anonymous said...

I think I hear Elvis..."and now, the end is near and so I face the final curtain..."

Hey Bob, you still eating deep fried twinkies big boy? Oh snap, Bob cant read this, he destroyed his hard drive...AGAIN!

Anonymous said...

He needs to buy those things in bulk or by the gross, at his rate of slanderous verbage.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

Am I the only one that can't get to columbuzz or is it down again?

Anonymous said...

I just saw that too, Dude. A lawyer probably told him to stop incriminating himself NOW! Obviously, that can't happen if he still has that outlet.

Anonymous said...

"Connection Interrupted



The document contains no data.

Ding dong the witch* is dead?

*Columbuzz







The network link was interrupted while negotiating a connection. Please try again.

Anonymous said...

There Goes another hard drive LOL

Anonymous said...

Bob has a counter at the bottom of colmbutt home page lmao
122265

Anonymous said...

Bob has a counter at the bottom of colmbutt home page lmao
122265
March 5, 2011 10:27 PM

THAT COUNTER IS AN HTML GRAPHIC THAT NEVER CHANGES. I HAVE LOOKED AT THE SOURCE CODE. BOB GRANDSTANDING AGAIN!

Anonymous said...

122281 now

Anonymous said...

That's a counter which cycles every time Bob says something stupid.

Once the court pronounces judgement against Bob, the counter will begin cycling backwards...

...like an odometer being tampered with.

Anonymous said...

Jeremy (Bob?) - "I think it is pretty bad that they have to spend their time taking someone to court.
Get a life folks."

I think it is pretty bad that Bob has to spend his time attacking Fred Barkes and others.
Get a life Bob.



Bob said this: "Someone wrote to say they heard the hospital was being evacuated.
We called the hospital and the woman that answered the phone said it wasn't true as far as she knew."

Bob will believe anything.
He actually called the hospital about this??
What an idiot.

Hey Bob.
I heard Big Foot was sighted at Mill Race Park.
Better get over there before the UFO kidnaps it.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

Jeremy (Bob?) - "I think it is pretty bad that they have to spend their time taking someone to court. Get a life folks."

I think that was trigger happy Justin who wrote that. I sure miss him on my blog. He was always good for a few laughs.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"Bob will believe anything."

You just misunderstand Bob's "genius".

Anonymous said...

Bob the newsman! God help us ALL!

Anonymous said...

WOW AND YOU REALLY CALLED TO SEE IF IT WAS TRUE.....OMG
U ARE AS STUPID AS PEOPLE SAY YOU ARE BOB

Phil Swaim said...

Funny thing, every single person who has commented on that site can be called in to testify. Bob will have to give up ALL IP addresses of commentors that the defense wants, and the judge will grant that request.

He may think that his commentors are safe, but they are not. Quite a few LIBEL cases concerning blogs have gone down that way.

Good thing I look up information and only state fact and only conclude based on facts presented when I post on my website. And I definitely don't call people whores. wow.

JGV said...

It's good to check rumors out before reporting them.

Bob you know thats not what i posted.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"It's good to check rumors out before reporting them."

When has Bob EVER checked out rumors before reporting them?

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"He may think that his commentors are safe, but they are not."

Yep, Jimmer Jones should be getting nervous at this point. I've saved a few of his nasty comments.

Danny Palmer said...

Notice how its dropped like a rock over there.
i think all the BOB O BOTS have jumped ship on him. AGAIN............

Mercman said...

From Phil:"Funny thing, every single person who has commented on that site can be called in to testify. Bob will have to give up ALL IP addresses of commentors that the defense wants, and the judge will grant that request.
He may think that his commentors are safe, but they are not."


Firstly, Bob, and others, have the ability to, and have been known to, edit comments to the point of COMPLETELY changing what was entered by the user.

And secondly, any I.P. addresses that Bob has recorded from being an administrator of that site, only indicates the PROVIDER, not the individual.

Thirdly, to identify the individual, a FEDERAL (interstate communications) warrant must be granted, and obtained, then executed through the Provider. The Provider must then disclose the user name of the particular account.

This type of information is rarely sought. And this type of action is only attempted in rare, and serious instances, such as National Security, or murder or kidnapping investigations.

Lastly, this is ALL ON BOB.
It is as simple and basic as that.

The outcome will be based on the validity, or the ability of the prosecution to prove it's claims by preponderance, of any evidence submitted, the degree of criminality, and the decision of the judge.
Of course, there may be variables such as Bob opening his mouth in court.

Regardless of the outcome, Bob has been checked, and will be under intense scrutiny in the future.

Anonymous said...

Don't worry Danny Bob will start making up people before long

Legal Ease said...

Sorry Phil, I diasgree with your premise that anyone other than Bob has anything to be concerned about. The suit has been filed by plaintiffs against Bob Freeman more than likely for comments made by Bob Freeman. There is nothing in the legal notices that Bob posted on Columbuzz to give anyone else pause for concern.

For example, this case is not about Milestone Ministries or Priscilla Scalf or Fred Armstrong, it is about ROBERT DEWAYNE FREEMAN and his comments REGARDING THE PLAINTIFFS. Period.

Legal Ease said...

Let me just add that Merc or someone commented about Bob editing and deleting comments. Again, this puts Bob in the crosshairs. It is Bob's obligation as "editor and publisher" to "moderate" the commentary. Almost all of the commentary in question has come from Bob. The court is not likely to allow the attorney for the plaintiff to go on a "fishing" expedition but rather to focus on specific comments by Bob Freeman that are libel.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

Anyone know why Capital One bank sued Bob last July? It looks like Bob lost the case in December but the case is still open. The court record mentions a judgment of over $6000.

Herman Forrester said...

Bob paid that account last month and he doesn't owe them anything now. He told me he stopped paying when they wouldn't reason with him about their outrageous interest rate and high late and over limit fees. He settled out of court with them. The court isn't aware of that yet.
Bob registered the domain name in his name. He owns the name only.
The website is a link to that name is all.
Bob doesn't do all of the moderating. I do most of it.
Now it is time to see which posts they are upset about and see how the court handles it.
I doubt this will ever make it to a courtroom. It will most likely be thrown out if it does make it.
The attorney didn't follow proper protocol.
The plaintiffs are required to specify which posts they believe were false, state what they believe is the truth, and give the defendent time to post what the plaintiff feels is the truth and to retract his statements.
They have done none of that. That was supposed to be done 4-11 days prior to filing the lawsuit.

Herman Forrester said...

And Bob has access to none of the technical items you speak of. It isn't his site and he has limited admin powers.
We will refuse to divulge any of that info because we protect the privacy of the posters who are civil.
Columbuzz.net is an empty domain name and we can cut the ties via link at anytime we choose. Columbuzz.net can be linked to yahoo.com or to McDonalds. This lawsuit is a sham being performed by an attorney who apparently can't even correctly spell terms for basic legal procedures for a set of four clowns who only hope for revenge.
Oddly it will only come back to bite them in the behind. Bob isn't the only one receiving support on this. We are being inundated with offers of help and evidence to support what has been said.
The Barkes herd is about to regret this move.
I am predicting Fred Barkes will resign his position before the year is out.

Anonymous said...

What I am reading Herman is speculation and hope, the reality in a court of law will be quite different. I take it from your post that you would like to be a party to this lawsuit as well. That can probably be arranged but where the law is concerned, regardless of how you think you understand it, Columbuzz belongs to Bob Freeman.

There is no point in arguing with what you think you know, the court will decide and you and Bob and Jeremy will get a LESSON in running a website.

Legal Ease said...

The lawsuit names Bob Freeman, not Columbuzz or any such entity. Herman is blowing about something he does not understand. This is about Bob, just how he likes it.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"He told me he stopped paying when they wouldn't reason with him about their outrageous interest rate and high late and over limit fees."

Did Bob forgot to read the fine print? I would guess it was Bob who wouldn't listen to reason.

"Bob doesn't do all of the moderating. I do most of it."

Then you're the worst moderator I've ever seen, Herman.

"I doubt this will ever make it to a courtroom. It will most likely be thrown out if it does make it."

Sounds like wishful thinking to me.

"The attorney didn't follow proper protocol."

If that's true, then I'm sure that can be fixed very easily. Follow the protocol and then re-file.

"The plaintiffs are required to specify which posts they believe were false, state what they believe is the truth, and give the defendent time to post what the plaintiff feels is the truth and to retract his statements."

Like Bob would retract his statements anyway.

Anonymous said...

03D02-1103-CT-01250 BARKES, FREDERICK PLAINTIFF Civil Open 03/03/2011
03D02-0705-SC-01177 BARKES, FREDERICK DEFENDANT Civil Closed 05/14/2007 06/15/2007
03D02-0204-IF-04028 BARKES, FREDERICK E 1945 DEFENDANT Citation Closed 04/08/2002 07/03/2002
03C01-9712-CP-02007 BARKES, FREDERICK E DEFENDANT Civil Closed 12/31/1997 02/03/1998

Anonymous said...

03D02-1103-CT-01250
BARKES, SANDRA
PLAINTIFF Civil Open 03/03/2011

03C01-9712-CP-02007
BARKES, SANDRA J
DEFENDANT Civil Closed 12/31/1997 02/03/1998

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"It isn't his site and he has limited admin powers."

Whatever Herman. Why should anyone believe you?

"We will refuse to divulge any of that info because we protect the privacy of the posters who are civil."

Yeah, that Jimmer Jones and Change, they're the most civil people I've ever seen. Herman, you really should stop embarrassing yourself. What if you get a court order to divulge that info? Are you prepared to go to jail, Herman?

"Columbuzz.net is an empty domain name and we can cut the ties via link at anytime we choose. Columbuzz.net can be linked to yahoo.com or to McDonalds."

Tell that to the judge.

"This lawsuit is a sham being performed by an attorney who apparently can't even correctly spell terms for basic legal procedures for a set of four clowns who only hope for revenge."

Herman, you really shouldn't lecture anyone about spelling issues. The only clowns I see are the three stooges at columbuzz.

"Oddly it will only come back to bite them in the behind. Bob isn't the only one receiving support on this. We are being inundated with offers of help and evidence to support what has been said."

Sure Herman, I believe you.

"The Barkes herd is about to regret this move."

More wishful thinking.

"I am predicting Fred Barkes will resign his position before the year is out."

Herman, you are truly an idiot so no one cares about your lame predictions.

Anonymous said...

Bob has the content in question Herman. Bob knows EXACTLY what this is about.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Poor Herman said...

I expect the judge will issue a gag order for those involved in this lawsuit. It will end any REAL discussion of what is going on other than what is done in court.

Anonymous said...

You can tell from Herman's posts that he and Bob have this all figured out. LOL They have NO IDEA what is coming in court.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"03D02-1103-CT-01250 BARKES, FREDERICK PLAINTIFF Civil Open 03/03/2011
03D02-0705-SC-01177 BARKES, FREDERICK DEFENDANT Civil Closed 05/14/2007 06/15/2007
03D02-0204-IF-04028 BARKES, FREDERICK E 1945 DEFENDANT Citation Closed 04/08/2002 07/03/2002
03C01-9712-CP-02007 BARKES, FREDERICK E DEFENDANT Civil Closed 12/31/1997 02/03/1998"

Have you looked at the details of the cases?

03D02-1103-CT-01250 - The one they just filed against Bob.

03D02-0705-SC-01177 - Dismissed.

03D02-0204-IF-04028 - THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT NOT GUILTY AND DISMISSES THIS CAUSE.

03C01-9712-CP-02007 - Dismissed.

Epic fail. Try again.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

Herman, you really need to get a life.

Herman Forrester said...

You're right Dude, I really need to get a life.

Anonymous said...

Fatass Freddie is going down!

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

I think you meant fatass Bob.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"I expect the judge will issue a gag order for those involved in this lawsuit. It will end any REAL discussion of what is going on other than what is done in court."

I doubt Bob could honor a gag order. I'd give him two days at the most before he violates it.

Anonymous said...

I hope Bob acts as his own counsel!

Who pays attention to Bob said...

Just my opinion but as Mr. Mouth Freeman seems to have virtually NO credibility in this community, and I suspect too very limited financial resources, I would doubt that suing him, even if prevailing in a judgment, is worth the time, effort and expense involved.

Bloodhound Harry said...

Herman Forrester A.K.A. Bob Freeman

Anyone wanna take bets?

Hi Bob.
You are not invisible.
I can smell you from a mile away.

NotDudeNotJeffBarkesNotMerc said...

I certainly don't know, but I suspect the lawsuit is more about getting Bob to shut up and quit saying such things (and hitting him where it hurts if necessary to do so) more than it is in trying to get a lot of money. True they seem to want to be reimbursed for the money they are having to spend to take this action (which I understand and would do myself), but it doesn't appear to be about the money. This point is substantiated by the fact that they at first gave him a chance to stop before attempting to go further with the suit.

Although Columbuzz could be used for good purposes (there are times that the Republic can't or doesn't cover everything others might desire and times where uncovering wrong going on is beneficial) I hope that Columbuzz is shut down due to this. As long as Bob and possibly others are in charge and allowed to do and say what they want as they are with no accountability, the place is a disaster that does more harm than good. But, I would be happy if Bob and at least some of the current team are removed and someone better put in place.