Bob wrote on columbuzz:
"I agree Misty. The article was out of line and I tried to straighten it up some."
Most of the "articles" on columbuzz are out of line, Bob.
"We walk a fine line of reporting and allowing people to voice their opinions here at Columbuzz, yet not at the cost to innocents."
Bob, you don't walk a fine line, you constantly go way over the line. And your statement "yet not at the cost to innocents" is just ridiculous.
"It appears that there's no excuse for hitting the man in dry weather. But it could have happened to any of us. If proper attention is paid, the man should have been seen."
Bob, yet again, you have no idea what you're talking about. You have no idea if he should have been seen.
"And we try to ask those questions and inform people."
You mean ask those idiotic questions.
"Joanna is new. She was trying to make a great story and didn't intend to hurt anyone."
Please. Joanna is not "new". She's been around for months.
"Our goal here is to inform people. We need more readers to inform more people, but building leadership is only to make the informing easier."
I believe your goal on columbuzz is to attack people, not inform.
"I help run this website. It isn't my website and I don't have total control."
Lie.
"Misty, you know me well enough to know that we would never intentionally hurt you. You have been a friend of mine for a while now, and recently, you have become family.(You know what I mean.) If I hurt you, I hurt me."
Misty, I don't believe Bob cares about you at all. He's manipulating you. "Jeremy" has made it clear that he only cares about hits on columbuzz.
"Just let me know when we stumble like this... Okay? We made a mistake and I apologize for that."
She did let you know and yet you took your time removing the article.
23 comments:
If Misty and Lucy hadn't complained (and they wouldn't probably had had they not had personal stakes in the story), it probably wouldn't have been removed. They have run "stories" about the kids who were on the ice and broke through and others that were detestable. Misty and Lucy are part of the clique there and are given at least some special treatment. They are allowed voices of dissent and might even get them to change their minds. Others raise points and get their posts changed or deleted.
Jeremy did make show his colors about wanting hits no matter who is hurt or even if the stories are real. This is a lot like Nathan who got off on drama. This is one other reason to believe that he is Nathan. Have you also noticed that Nathan's name gets censored there by ***? Then Jeremy tries to throw the heat off by insulting how the site used to be.
Again Anonymous, Nathan isn't apart of the site, he did set the technical details of the website thus creating the *** when the name Nathan is entered in a comment.
I am interested in meeting him since he seems to be apart of your vocabulary. How did the meeting go with him and the city, I have waited to hear about that but you never said.
Fill us in please.
Hey Jeremy! I have a question for you. Does being totally incompetent come naturally to you or do you have to work at it?
I work at it; it is good for moral.
I think you meant morale. Still taking English classes?
Keystroke error on my part, and yes I am still taking classes.
Well, don't ever stop. You have MUCH to learn.
Also, you know how I love to offer my constructive criticism of you and your site so here goes. That article was one of the worst I've read on columbuzz. You will never get new advertisers with that kind of garbage.
Which? Should I remove it?
All of them. But you made a good start with the one you already deleted.
Lucy wrote:
"I thought columbuzz was better than to stoop so low."
Funny stuff.
"I am interested in meeting him since he seems to be apart of your vocabulary"
I think you mean a part.
"How did the meeting go with him and the city, I have waited to hear about that but you never said."
This just in: There are more than one of us who use the name anonymous. I mean, it is for those of use who don't want to choose a name or type it in. Hopefully I have taught you two things in this post.
I think I'm getting a grasp on the dynamic at columbuzz.
Jeremy/Nathan likes the attention and seeing his name (even if it is fake)is a thrill. He does not have the ability or drive to join a legitimate site so he will invest his time at columbuzz. He is willing to do whatever it takes (i.e. lies, accusations, speculation, tawdry rumors etc)to keep getting that thrill.
Bob craves attention and acceptance. He will lie, cheat and steal to get what he wants. He has ambition but lacks the intelligence and/or creativity to get it legitimately (see get rich schemes). Bob feels the best way to prop himself up is to put others down. Bob attacks and victimizes people from the safety of his computer.
Joanna is a wanna be. She has been a bob-o-bot for a long time and wants a part of the columbuzz action (cue laugh track). She has no training/experience writing for public consumption. She probably spends little time, if any, reading (actually READING, not skimming)legitimate news sources. She feels more at home with tabloids and gossip sites/shows/magazines than "60 Minutes".
I doubt Joanna is inherently viscious or apathetic to consequences like Bob and Jeremy/Nathan. I think her tendency to make fun of people struck by tragedy (even if by their own hand) shows lack of an inner dialogue. Thus she tries to attack and humiliate people in terrible situations.
Here's a helpful tool the next time she wants to call a severely injured girl "mental" or a dead man a "speed bump": She should picture herself in a group of strangers while she calls a horribly injured or recently dead person names. If she can't picture the disgust in their eyes, there's no hope for her. If she can picture that disgust, then for heaven's sake do not post those thoughts on the internet.
Remembering 9-11 by showing us gas prices in 2002? T this point I've decided that Bob and his cronies are just f***ing with us all. Trolling is the term we youngsters are using.
I am very well aware of the workings of Columbuzz because I've been told by Bob. "Jeremy" is absolutely Nathan Wiley! He's rather immature in his denials but I can tell you without a doubt that "Jeremy" is Nathan!
try to comment on looseys comment an i got a big
This story is restricted to a certain type of member, click register to signup or login. Thanks.
wow what bunch of a$$wipes
there as goofy as one can get.....
Bozo Bob Says
"That seems strange since they were all for making it union when they thought I was going to win the election and do away with the paid fire staff."
Now that is extremely laughable as NO ONE ever thought Bozo would ever win the trustee's election other than Bozo himself and maybe a couple of his air headed Bob o Bots.
RECENT COMMENT - "I am very well aware of the workings of Columbuzz because I've been told by Bob. "Jeremy" is absolutely Nathan Wiley!"
* * * * * * * * *
Bob has already snitched on his companion.
Bob can't keep a secret and is loyal to nobody.
If Bob knows it, he wants the world to know that he knows it so he publishes it.
Bob is like a singing bird.
Telephone, telegraph, teleBob.
ANONYMOUS - "I am waiting for the day when Bob Freeman or Nathan Wiley takes a photo of me in such close proximity. I will take their camera or cell phone and shove it straight up their ass."
BOB - "Someone on another site said that if Jeremy or myself ever came up and took a picture of them like that, they would shove the camera up our ass."
Jeremy Kirtz = Nathan Wiley
As proven by testimony from Bob Freeman.
No longer an accusation without proof.
A FACT.
"That seems strange since they were all for making it union when they thought I was going to win the election and do away with the paid fire staff."
Bob SAID he wanted to do away with the paid fire fighters. He said the unemployed could fight fires. Remember? He backed off when unions attacked him and when others told him how idiotic he sounded about the unemployed.
He backed off when I started in on him about bashing unions and sent an email out to my union letting them know not to support him. he also thinks a meeting between Union employees and management is open door. Union business is just that, Union business. Stay out and let the process run it's course, douchebag.
I think I know why Bob Freeman seems to be such a moron.
Bob: "My guess is the stragety is to get rid of Brent to scare the other members into dropping the union."
He has Dyslexia.
He sees everything ass-backwards!
Crissie Rice wrote on columbuzz:
"I want to thank you Bob for taking a few pics for me they turned out really nice and it was appreciated, if not I don't think I would of had any of me in them. You're a very considerate and kind hearted man, we see it even if some don't."
Wow, I guess Crissie Rice hasn't read some of Bob's rants!
She has read them and she likes what he's all about because she is all about the same things.
Post a Comment