Warning! This post contains adult language! Reader discretion is advised.
Bob #1:
"I'm not a gun fan. I don't want one in my house. I don't like to shoot them. The thought of an accidental shooting, or a senseless shooting in a rage, scares me to death!"
Bob #2:
"Dude asked me today if I own a .357. I don't but I own a few guns. Give me reason assholes. Back the fuck off."
"I know where some of you live. You want to cross the line, then lets cross the fucking line. It would be worth some time in jail to destroy your homes. And the lives of some of your family."
"You keep saying on here that I'm nuts and a retard. Piss me off and find out. I could play the part in a HUGE way"
"You talk big when others that I do know will suffer. I will not tolerate it. Try me, asshole."
Is Bob afraid that someone will use one of his guns to commit a senseless shooting in a rage? He should be.
Friday, January 14, 2011
Web Traffic
Currently I'm getting about half the web traffic of columbuzz, but almost three times the visitor participation.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
I Just Love Proving Bob Wrong
On Tuesday, Jeremy (admin of columbuzz) wrote:
"Dude, I want to email you some code for your header, provided you are open to sharing. You say you have all these visitors, If you are willing how about placing some Google Analytic code in your site so your traffic can be tracked and shared publicly. I don't look forward to you accepting the challenge but it is worth asking."
An anonymous commenter wrote:
"You lie about your visitors. Prove you have more than ten people come here each day."
Bob has written in the past:
"I think that site is basically 2 or 3 people max"
Since I was 99.9% sure that there are more than 10 people that read my blog, it was yet another opportunity to prove Bob wrong. So I decided to add Google Analytics code to my blog just to see how many people were actually visiting. Here are the results from the first day and a half (around half of Tuesday and all of Wednesday):
And before anyone writes that I just made these numbers up, I have downloaded the data in PDF format and emailed it to Bob, so both Bob and Jeremy know the data is legitimate.
"Dude, I want to email you some code for your header, provided you are open to sharing. You say you have all these visitors, If you are willing how about placing some Google Analytic code in your site so your traffic can be tracked and shared publicly. I don't look forward to you accepting the challenge but it is worth asking."
An anonymous commenter wrote:
"You lie about your visitors. Prove you have more than ten people come here each day."
Bob has written in the past:
"I think that site is basically 2 or 3 people max"
Since I was 99.9% sure that there are more than 10 people that read my blog, it was yet another opportunity to prove Bob wrong. So I decided to add Google Analytics code to my blog just to see how many people were actually visiting. Here are the results from the first day and a half (around half of Tuesday and all of Wednesday):
54 people visited this site
206 Visits
54 Absolute Unique Visitors
811 Pageviews
3.94 Average Pageviews
00:07:27 Time on Site
26.21% Bounce Rate
16.50% New Visits
206 Visits
54 Absolute Unique Visitors
811 Pageviews
3.94 Average Pageviews
00:07:27 Time on Site
26.21% Bounce Rate
16.50% New Visits
And before anyone writes that I just made these numbers up, I have downloaded the data in PDF format and emailed it to Bob, so both Bob and Jeremy know the data is legitimate.
Voice of Reason
http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=5486
Comment from Phil Swaim on columbuzz:
"C'mon, let's be logical. Everyone who is trying to point fingers at their political enemies for this travesty is a poor excuse for a human being much less a representative of the people.
Barack Obama had it right in his speech he gave. This is a time for us to come together. It's not a time for nutty political theories as to the cause of this event."
If I'm not mistaken, I believe Phil is implying that Bob is illogical and a poor excuse for a human being. I couldn't agree more.
Comment from Phil Swaim on columbuzz:
"C'mon, let's be logical. Everyone who is trying to point fingers at their political enemies for this travesty is a poor excuse for a human being much less a representative of the people.
Barack Obama had it right in his speech he gave. This is a time for us to come together. It's not a time for nutty political theories as to the cause of this event."
If I'm not mistaken, I believe Phil is implying that Bob is illogical and a poor excuse for a human being. I couldn't agree more.
Should Bob Really Be Ranting About Palin?
What exactly does a picture of a masked gunman have to do with a Columbus Township Trustee budget hearing?
UPDATE: The picture is still there as of noon today:
http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=4770
UPDATE: The picture is still there as of noon today:
http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=4770
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Bob's Still Ranting About Palin
"Dimwit Sarah Palin apparently can do whatever she wants, but let others TALK about doing exactly the same thing, and all hell breaks loose."
That's funny, Bob calling someone else a dimwit. And when will Bob learn that TALK has consequences when it includes threats of violence?
"She even puts crosshairs on each Democrats location, so people know where the bad guys are."
Note Bob wrote location.
"Yea, they're right, it has targets all over it. Targeting states, not human beings.
Big difference.
I don't remember any nutcase going out and assassinating a state. Maybe I missed it."
Which is it Bob? Is Palin's map targeting locations or human beings? It looks like locations to me.
"They are actually a bunch of Fred Barkes fans that aren't real bright"
Please provide proof that I'm not real bright. I have provided ample proof that you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.
"and they are still bitter that I brought out so much truth about Fred and his gang during the election."
Now, Bob, who's bitter? That would be you, Mr. 0-5.
"Apparently they are on his payroll somehow too."
Wrong!
"Sarah Palin can burn down an orphanage in front of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir; that would be fine. But let Bob Freeman walk past the front of that orphanage and they will say that I went in and chopped all the kids up. There was no threat from me. But if it's fine for some dingaling from Alaska to do, shouldn't it be okay for me to do? They said she did nothing wrong. So why shouldn't I post a map of Columbus with crosshairs where people are that I want 'removed?'"
The difference is that you have threatened and advocated violence in the past. Plus, you are not well mentally.
That's funny, Bob calling someone else a dimwit. And when will Bob learn that TALK has consequences when it includes threats of violence?
"She even puts crosshairs on each Democrats location, so people know where the bad guys are."
Note Bob wrote location.
"Yea, they're right, it has targets all over it. Targeting states, not human beings.
Big difference.
I don't remember any nutcase going out and assassinating a state. Maybe I missed it."
Which is it Bob? Is Palin's map targeting locations or human beings? It looks like locations to me.
"They are actually a bunch of Fred Barkes fans that aren't real bright"
Please provide proof that I'm not real bright. I have provided ample proof that you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.
"and they are still bitter that I brought out so much truth about Fred and his gang during the election."
Now, Bob, who's bitter? That would be you, Mr. 0-5.
"Apparently they are on his payroll somehow too."
Wrong!
"Sarah Palin can burn down an orphanage in front of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir; that would be fine. But let Bob Freeman walk past the front of that orphanage and they will say that I went in and chopped all the kids up. There was no threat from me. But if it's fine for some dingaling from Alaska to do, shouldn't it be okay for me to do? They said she did nothing wrong. So why shouldn't I post a map of Columbus with crosshairs where people are that I want 'removed?'"
The difference is that you have threatened and advocated violence in the past. Plus, you are not well mentally.
Bob vs. Bob 8.0
Bob #1:
"I don't blame Sarah Palin directly."
Bob #2:
"So, Sarah Palin shouldn't be blamed for the shootings that happened in Tucson last Saturday?" "I don't think so..."
What's really scary is that these two conflicting statements were posted on columbuzz less than two hours apart.
"I don't blame Sarah Palin directly."
Bob #2:
"So, Sarah Palin shouldn't be blamed for the shootings that happened in Tucson last Saturday?" "I don't think so..."
What's really scary is that these two conflicting statements were posted on columbuzz less than two hours apart.
Bob's Ranting Again
"So, Sarah Palin shouldn't be blamed for the shootings that happened in Tucson last Saturday?"
No, I believe Jared Loughner should be blamed for the shootings in Tucson.
"Crosshairs on a map with people named that should be gotten rid of is fine behavior? Seriously?"
Crosshairs on a map was probably not the best way for her to illustrate her point, since a mentally ill person could see it as a call to arms (not unlike your threats of violence). But I have not heard if Mr. Loughner is a Palin supporter or not. And you lecturing about fine behavior? Priceless.
"So it would be fine for me to post a map of Columbus with crosshairs over the fire station a jerk of a fire chief runs? I think he should be 'removed.'
Maybe crosshairs over 13th and Washington St.? I can think of an entire staff that need to be 'removed' there.
Maybe I don't like the job the principle at North High School is doing. Crosshairs there okay?
Some don't like the job City Council is doing. So, City Hall too?
A detective at CPD screwed me over pretty good right before the election. How about crosshairs on CPD and his home address? Would that be okay?
Mike Pence said politics had nothing to do with it. Crosshairs?"
Veiled threats from Bob?
"If Sarah Palin can do it, can't we all?
Being closer to home puts a little different light on it, doesn't it?
I would never do that, but according to you, Sarah Palin should not be blamed for the deaths of 6 people or the shootings of 14 others."
Bob, you say you would never do that, but your previous actions tell a different story. And I guess you're saying that if someone hurts one of the workers in the trustee office, we can all blame you.
"She only told people that those 20 were targets and 18 of them had already been removed; only two left. So some whacko shot one of them and 19 of her friends.
Harmless?
Blameless?
I don't think so..."
Please stop thinking Bob.
"Like I said, time to stop and think."
I agree Bob. It is past time for you to stop and think.
And I guess Democrats have forgotten their targeting map from 2004, since they're starting to lob grenades at Palin:
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253055&kaid=127&subid=171
No, I believe Jared Loughner should be blamed for the shootings in Tucson.
"Crosshairs on a map with people named that should be gotten rid of is fine behavior? Seriously?"
Crosshairs on a map was probably not the best way for her to illustrate her point, since a mentally ill person could see it as a call to arms (not unlike your threats of violence). But I have not heard if Mr. Loughner is a Palin supporter or not. And you lecturing about fine behavior? Priceless.
"So it would be fine for me to post a map of Columbus with crosshairs over the fire station a jerk of a fire chief runs? I think he should be 'removed.'
Maybe crosshairs over 13th and Washington St.? I can think of an entire staff that need to be 'removed' there.
Maybe I don't like the job the principle at North High School is doing. Crosshairs there okay?
Some don't like the job City Council is doing. So, City Hall too?
A detective at CPD screwed me over pretty good right before the election. How about crosshairs on CPD and his home address? Would that be okay?
Mike Pence said politics had nothing to do with it. Crosshairs?"
Veiled threats from Bob?
"If Sarah Palin can do it, can't we all?
Being closer to home puts a little different light on it, doesn't it?
I would never do that, but according to you, Sarah Palin should not be blamed for the deaths of 6 people or the shootings of 14 others."
Bob, you say you would never do that, but your previous actions tell a different story. And I guess you're saying that if someone hurts one of the workers in the trustee office, we can all blame you.
"She only told people that those 20 were targets and 18 of them had already been removed; only two left. So some whacko shot one of them and 19 of her friends.
Harmless?
Blameless?
I don't think so..."
Please stop thinking Bob.
"Like I said, time to stop and think."
I agree Bob. It is past time for you to stop and think.
And I guess Democrats have forgotten their targeting map from 2004, since they're starting to lob grenades at Palin:
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253055&kaid=127&subid=171
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Bob vs. Bob vs. Bob vs. Bob...
Bob wrote on columbuzz:
"I have been accused of writing this article. I did not.
We have 20-25 people who write and post articles here. Mostly 5 to 6 but there are many who do from time to time."
So does that mean that Bob has 14 to 19 personalities?
"You only know me because I am the most vocal and probably the most opinionated of the bunch."
Bob, I think you meant to type "the most idiotic", although Jeremy and Herman come close.
"I have been accused of writing this article. I did not.
We have 20-25 people who write and post articles here. Mostly 5 to 6 but there are many who do from time to time."
So does that mean that Bob has 14 to 19 personalities?
"You only know me because I am the most vocal and probably the most opinionated of the bunch."
Bob, I think you meant to type "the most idiotic", although Jeremy and Herman come close.
Get Over It Already!
http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=5474
Bob wrote the following caption under a picture of the trustee sign:
"You'll have to find another place for your family reunions......"
First it was nepotism, then it was cronyism. Yawn. Bob, you lost! Stop whining and get over it! Face it, you are unelectable! 0-5!
Bob wrote the following caption under a picture of the trustee sign:
"You'll have to find another place for your family reunions......"
First it was nepotism, then it was cronyism. Yawn. Bob, you lost! Stop whining and get over it! Face it, you are unelectable! 0-5!
Monday, January 10, 2011
Arizona Shooting
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/0108/Arizona-shooting-Rep.-Gabrielle-Giffords-hit-at-meeting-with-constituents
When something like this happens, I become more and more concerned about Bob's threats of violence and the way he demonizes people, especially those in the trustee office.
When something like this happens, I become more and more concerned about Bob's threats of violence and the way he demonizes people, especially those in the trustee office.
Saturday, January 8, 2011
Bob vs Bob 7.0
Bob #1:
"I broke no laws with the odometer deal."
Bob #2:
"An ex Franklin cop, one of our drivers, is the one that told me it was illegal and he brought me the same legal stuff posted at your site."
"Using it to shut off an odometer was illegal."
"I wonder what the statute of limitations is on something like this"
"I broke no laws with the odometer deal."
Bob #2:
"An ex Franklin cop, one of our drivers, is the one that told me it was illegal and he brought me the same legal stuff posted at your site."
"Using it to shut off an odometer was illegal."
"I wonder what the statute of limitations is on something like this"
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
Bob vs Bob 6.0
Bob #1:
"I really hate that people found out that I had anything to do with the cross. That was never my intention."
Bob #2:
"Also, we have a white cross available to place as a memorial. Is there a place that would be available to place it? It is made from 4x4s and it would be approx. 4' tall once in the ground."
"Would you like the cross at the end of the dam closest to I-65 or the end closest to Tipton Lakes? The cross is painted and ready now. If I don't hear from you, we will decide where to place it once we get there."
"We placed the cross at the end of the dam."
"For one, I had Christians help me make it and paint it. And when we took it out to place it at the lake, I had Christians with me helping out."
"But we got it in place."
"We've done been there and the job was accomplished..."
"So, anyway, we were already there. We didn't snoop. We didn't walk. We drove up, dug the hole, dropped the cross in, tamped the dirt, took a few pictures, and left."
"I really hate that people found out that I had anything to do with the cross. That was never my intention."
Bob #2:
"Also, we have a white cross available to place as a memorial. Is there a place that would be available to place it? It is made from 4x4s and it would be approx. 4' tall once in the ground."
"Would you like the cross at the end of the dam closest to I-65 or the end closest to Tipton Lakes? The cross is painted and ready now. If I don't hear from you, we will decide where to place it once we get there."
"We placed the cross at the end of the dam."
"For one, I had Christians help me make it and paint it. And when we took it out to place it at the lake, I had Christians with me helping out."
"But we got it in place."
"We've done been there and the job was accomplished..."
"So, anyway, we were already there. We didn't snoop. We didn't walk. We drove up, dug the hole, dropped the cross in, tamped the dirt, took a few pictures, and left."
Knee Jerk Reactions
http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=5395
Bob wrote: "Knee jerk reaction is better than no reaction."
Bob, do you know what's better than both a knee jerk reaction and no reaction? A reasoned, intelligent reaction. But it's obvious that you're incapable of both a reasoned, intelligent reaction and no reaction, so knee jerk is all you can contribute.
Quotes from Bob:
"As stated in the editorial in The Republic, some concerns were, I suppose, knee jerk reactions."
I suppose?!? What about the other things mentioned by The Republic? You know, unsubstantiated charges, little or no factual information, uninformed speculation, finger pointing, and uninformed accusations, which is your typical Method of Operation.
"Not everyone in the public arena knows what goes on behind the scenes."
You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes either. You just think you do.
"Call me crazy"
My pleasure. You're crazy.
Bob wrote: "Knee jerk reaction is better than no reaction."
Bob, do you know what's better than both a knee jerk reaction and no reaction? A reasoned, intelligent reaction. But it's obvious that you're incapable of both a reasoned, intelligent reaction and no reaction, so knee jerk is all you can contribute.
Quotes from Bob:
"As stated in the editorial in The Republic, some concerns were, I suppose, knee jerk reactions."
I suppose?!? What about the other things mentioned by The Republic? You know, unsubstantiated charges, little or no factual information, uninformed speculation, finger pointing, and uninformed accusations, which is your typical Method of Operation.
"Not everyone in the public arena knows what goes on behind the scenes."
You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes either. You just think you do.
"Call me crazy"
My pleasure. You're crazy.
Monday, January 3, 2011
And Another Uncivil Comment Not Deleted From Columbuzz
Bob wrote:
"Everyone will post civally or their posts will be deleted. Disagreeing with what is said here is fine. Attacking people for what they post here is not."
Recent comment on columbuzz:
"Hey Lake, I know a great church you can go to. Milestone Ministries is just as hateful as you.
I think you would really enjoy it. Look up Tim Miracle, he may even help pull that cross up.
You are just as bad as those idiots that protest at military funerals. Your comments lead me to believe you are a counterfeit Christian.
At least Bob is honest about it, instead of being a jackass hiding behind 'religion'"
"Everyone will post civally or their posts will be deleted. Disagreeing with what is said here is fine. Attacking people for what they post here is not."
Recent comment on columbuzz:
"Hey Lake, I know a great church you can go to. Milestone Ministries is just as hateful as you.
I think you would really enjoy it. Look up Tim Miracle, he may even help pull that cross up.
You are just as bad as those idiots that protest at military funerals. Your comments lead me to believe you are a counterfeit Christian.
At least Bob is honest about it, instead of being a jackass hiding behind 'religion'"
Sunday, January 2, 2011
Bob's Freudian Slip?
Bob wrote in a comment on columbuzz:
"Dude, if your comments are on topic about the topic, they will not go on."
LOL! You're right Bob. If my comments are on topic, they will NOT go on. Of course once he reads this post, he'll fix his comment.
"Dude, if your comments are on topic about the topic, they will not go on."
LOL! You're right Bob. If my comments are on topic, they will NOT go on. Of course once he reads this post, he'll fix his comment.
My Blog
Bob and the Bots are sure making a big fuss over a blog that "hardly nobody reads":
- Bob is writing articles about my blog (yet he still has not posted the address)
- Lucy and Misty are commenting about my blog on columbuzz
- Shawn has created an anti-Dude blog (note that I have not deleted the address from my blog)
- Bob and Jeremy are posting comments here again
The Republic's Opinion
http://hneolive.therepublic.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TheRepublic&BaseHref=TRP/2011/01/02&PageLabel=B4&EntityId=Ar01201&ViewMode=HTML
Quotes from The Republic op-ed:
"It was an unspeakable tragedy and it has raised several questions about whether the county is prepared to handle such situations. It has also brought forth unsubstantiated charges that local governments have spent public money on other projects while neglecting to expend what some consider to be modest amounts for life saving equipment."
"The charges have largely been knee jerk reactions based on little or no factual information."
"It is important they be addressed by the agencies participating in the upcoming meeting and answered in such a manner as to end this uninformed speculation."
"The decisions that should emerge must be based upon a reasoned and informed review of these kinds of situations. Finger pointing and uniformed accusations will only complicate matters."
The Republic sure has Bob pegged:
Quotes from The Republic op-ed:
"It was an unspeakable tragedy and it has raised several questions about whether the county is prepared to handle such situations. It has also brought forth unsubstantiated charges that local governments have spent public money on other projects while neglecting to expend what some consider to be modest amounts for life saving equipment."
"The charges have largely been knee jerk reactions based on little or no factual information."
"It is important they be addressed by the agencies participating in the upcoming meeting and answered in such a manner as to end this uninformed speculation."
"The decisions that should emerge must be based upon a reasoned and informed review of these kinds of situations. Finger pointing and uniformed accusations will only complicate matters."
The Republic sure has Bob pegged:
- unsubstantiated charges
- knee jerk reactions
- little or no factual information
- uninformed speculation
- finger pointing
- uninformed accusations
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Wonderland is Reality Land
"And the idiots over in wonderland say I used the drowning story to attack Fred and Rodney again, because the accident happened in city limits."
It's obvious to everyone why you wrote the article.
"Fred Barkes and Rodney Ferrenburg were the ones that ranted about 'needing to be prepared' and having a contract 'to help other departments.' They are the ones that spent money on everything they wanted, regardless of what they needed. They have a maintenance building they don't need. They spent $3000 for exercize equipment from Rodney and Brianna. Maybe it's needed but apparently not as badly as ice water rescue staff and equipment."
So I guess you now have an excuse to blame Fred and Rodney for everything, even if it's not in their jurisdiction. Convenient. And when are you going to write an article slamming the mayor for not prioritizing correctly? I won't hold my breath.
"Most of the past year, I have been finding out crap that THEY have been doing. So yea,I 'attacke' them, by bringiong out facts."
THEY have been doing their jobs. You just like to complain and attack.
"You'll notice, that in the article I faulted every fire department in the county. I still do. It's sickening that better help wasn't available for that boy."
What's sickening is you using the death of that boy to further your agenda.
It's obvious to everyone why you wrote the article.
"Fred Barkes and Rodney Ferrenburg were the ones that ranted about 'needing to be prepared' and having a contract 'to help other departments.' They are the ones that spent money on everything they wanted, regardless of what they needed. They have a maintenance building they don't need. They spent $3000 for exercize equipment from Rodney and Brianna. Maybe it's needed but apparently not as badly as ice water rescue staff and equipment."
So I guess you now have an excuse to blame Fred and Rodney for everything, even if it's not in their jurisdiction. Convenient. And when are you going to write an article slamming the mayor for not prioritizing correctly? I won't hold my breath.
"Most of the past year, I have been finding out crap that THEY have been doing. So yea,I 'attacke' them, by bringiong out facts."
THEY have been doing their jobs. You just like to complain and attack.
"You'll notice, that in the article I faulted every fire department in the county. I still do. It's sickening that better help wasn't available for that boy."
What's sickening is you using the death of that boy to further your agenda.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)