"Dimwit Sarah Palin apparently can do whatever she wants, but let others TALK about doing exactly the same thing, and all hell breaks loose."
That's funny, Bob calling someone else a dimwit. And when will Bob learn that TALK has consequences when it includes threats of violence?
"She even puts crosshairs on each Democrats location, so people know where the bad guys are."
Note Bob wrote location.
"Yea, they're right, it has targets all over it. Targeting states, not human beings.
Big difference.
I don't remember any nutcase going out and assassinating a state. Maybe I missed it."
Which is it Bob? Is Palin's map targeting locations or human beings? It looks like locations to me.
"They are actually a bunch of Fred Barkes fans that aren't real bright"
Please provide proof that I'm not real bright. I have provided ample proof that you are not the sharpest tool in the shed.
"and they are still bitter that I brought out so much truth about Fred and his gang during the election."
Now, Bob, who's bitter? That would be you, Mr. 0-5.
"Apparently they are on his payroll somehow too."
Wrong!
"Sarah Palin can burn down an orphanage in front of the Mormon Tabernacle Choir; that would be fine. But let Bob Freeman walk past the front of that orphanage and they will say that I went in and chopped all the kids up. There was no threat from me. But if it's fine for some dingaling from Alaska to do, shouldn't it be okay for me to do? They said she did nothing wrong. So why shouldn't I post a map of Columbus with crosshairs where people are that I want 'removed?'"
The difference is that you have threatened and advocated violence in the past. Plus, you are not well mentally.
13 comments:
The difference is MAJOR, Bob. Bob, you have spoken threats of violence where there was no question about what your words meant. You have been quite clear so save your analysis for the mental health professionals who will evaluate YOU before trial.
----------------------------------------------
So why shouldn't I post a map of Columbus with crosshairs where people are that I want 'removed?'"
I WISH YOU WOULD. PLEASE!
"They are actually a bunch of Fred Barkes fans that aren't real bright"
I HAD NEVER HEARD OF FRED BARKES UNTIL THE ELECTION AND TRUTHFULLY BOB, HE MUST BE A STAND UP GUY TO HAVE ENDURED YOUR WRATH. YOU ARE PATHETIC!
"and they are still bitter that I brought out so much truth about Fred and his gang during the election."
NO, BOB, HERE IS THE DIFFERENCE. WE, THE PEOPLE, HATE YOUR GUTS. IT'S JUST THAT SIMPLE AND WE DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING YOU SAY.
YOU, BOB, ARE BITTER. JUST A BITTER OLD TURD!
Comment from columbuzz: "The Mayor is a nice guy to talk to. You're quite correct. But just say something negative to him about something he's done and see what attitude you get. I could never support someone who buys alcohol with taxpayer money and I told him about it. His response was to turn bright red, huff and puff a couple times and turn and walk away."
Sounds like something Bob would do. No wonder Bob likes him so much.
Bob comparing himself to Sarah Palin is priceless. I had to screen-grab that for a hearty laugh.
The Bob said:
I am the new anti-Christ and they are calling the police and the FBI and the Pope because I have threatened to shoot and kill half of Columbus.
YOUR'E RIGHT BOB. I CALLED THE POLICE TODAY AND SENT SCREEN-CAPTURES OF YOUR RANTS TO THE FBI FIELD OFFICE IN INDIANAPOLIS. THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I HAVE HEARD YOU SAY "I have threatened to shoot and kill half of Columbus." SO I WENT AHEAD AND JUST SENT THAT ALSO. ANYTHING ELSE DUMB-F***?
There was no threat from me.
OH REALLY? I CAN THINK OF MANY WRITTEN ON THIS BLOG. THEY WERE SENT AWHILE BACK TO THE FBI FIELD OFFICE AND I CALLED THE COLUMBUS POLICE ON THAT ONE ALSO.
But if it's fine for the ex-governor of Alaska to do, shouldn't it be okay for me to do?
ONCE AGAIN BOB, YOU TOLD ALL OF US YOU HAD A .357 AND YOU MADE VEILED THREATS TO DO PHYSICAL HARM TO ONE OR MORE PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR THREATS, BOB, ARE TANGIBLE. THERE IS NO QUESTION AS TO YOUR WORD USAGE.
I WISH LIKE HELL YOU WOULD STEP ONTO MY PROPERTY NEAR OGILVILLE. I WOULD HAVE ONE HELL OF A WELCOME FOR YOU FAT BOY!
Interesting analogy from Bob. I have yet to find anywhere that Sarah Palin called someone a "cunt", "whore" or encouraged violence against anyone. There is a big difference between Sarah Palin and Bob Freeman.
Sarah Palin may be a "dingbat" but Bob Freeman is a infantile foul-mouthed jerk with absolutely no people skills whatsoever.
Bob Freeman has targeted specific people MANY times.
Here ya go, Bob, you jerk....HOLD STILL!
TARGET v. - definition -
1. to use, set up, or designate as a target or goal.
2. to make a target of (an object, person, Bob Freeman, city, etc.) for attack or bombardment.
3. to continually expose someone as an idiot...because they ask for it.
Got a problem with the picture, Bob?
Call a cop.
Whiners like you, make them laugh.
Wow! I'm an avid news fan and an even bigger Bob Freeman hater. I never thought I'd have to decide who was the bigger idiot, Sarah Palin or Bob Freeman? I think Bob should release his poor wife and get with his equally ignorant Sarah Palin. They're a match made in HELL!
Anonymous wrote: "I've been edited on here several times because I speak the truth. I refuse to give up... (Violent gay bashing about Bob and gays deleted)"
Yes, you have been edited here and you will continue to be edited here. If you post comments that threaten to kill people, they will be removed.
"Admit it! I only speak what many of you want to. You feel the same way but are afraid to say it because it's not politically correct. Stop being scared! SPEAK OUT!!!"
OK, I'll speak out. If this was a serious comment and not spam, then you need to get some mental help immediately. I personally do not feel the same way. You are no better than Bob with your threats of violence.
Since my last posted comment (the link) was not deleted, I think that Dude understood my intent.
The image is not a death threat, and I believe that even a lame-brain such as Bob, would not take it as such.
I am a United States citizen, and it is my right as one, to express myself in a creative and/or artistic manner, as long as I am not in violation of the law.
(Though Freedom of Expression does not guarantee the approval of the administrator of this Blog to post anything here)
Referencing a photo of Bob Freeman with crosshairs on his forehead is not a crime,
but if Bob truly believes that Sarah Palin's selectively placed crosshairs are responsible for some nut-job's murderous action against one of her "targeted" individuals.....then his own life must now be in emminent danger perpetrated from any nut-job that may happen upon the humorous image of crosshairs superimposed upon Bob's big, chubby, "broad side of a barn" head.
Do You ?
http://1dl.us/ex8.jpg
That's weird. What happened to my last comment?
It was here. Now it's gone. ?????
Sometimes comments will appear for a minute and then get put in a spam folder and then Dude posts them later. Please stand by :-)
"That's weird. What happened to my last comment?
It was here. Now it's gone. ?????"
I don't see anything in the spam folder.
Bob Wrote: "The same people who act like I'm a criminal for asking if it would be okay if I made a map of Columbus with crosshairs on it posted this on their website last night."
Everyone knows you're a criminal Bob. Remember your "shenanigans" with the odometer tampering device?
Post a Comment