"Dude, I want to email you some code for your header, provided you are open to sharing. You say you have all these visitors, If you are willing how about placing some Google Analytic code in your site so your traffic can be tracked and shared publicly. I don't look forward to you accepting the challenge but it is worth asking."
An anonymous commenter wrote:
"You lie about your visitors. Prove you have more than ten people come here each day."
Bob has written in the past:
"I think that site is basically 2 or 3 people max"
Since I was 99.9% sure that there are more than 10 people that read my blog, it was yet another opportunity to prove Bob wrong. So I decided to add Google Analytics code to my blog just to see how many people were actually visiting. Here are the results from the first day and a half (around half of Tuesday and all of Wednesday):
54 people visited this site
206 Visits
54 Absolute Unique Visitors
811 Pageviews
3.94 Average Pageviews
00:07:27 Time on Site
26.21% Bounce Rate
16.50% New Visits
206 Visits
54 Absolute Unique Visitors
811 Pageviews
3.94 Average Pageviews
00:07:27 Time on Site
26.21% Bounce Rate
16.50% New Visits
And before anyone writes that I just made these numbers up, I have downloaded the data in PDF format and emailed it to Bob, so both Bob and Jeremy know the data is legitimate.
71 comments:
As I suspected. Many, many people are on this blog and representative of a much greater community that loathes Bob Freeman.
Hey Jeremy, lets see your numbers if you can figure it out.
Now I wonder if they'll post their stats. lol I doubt it.
Columbuzz.net so far this year:
4,362 Visits
15,447 Pageviews
3.54 Pages/Visit
40.21% Bounce Rate
00:04:59 Avg. Time on Site
30.38% % New Visits
Columbuzz.net yesterday and today:
640 Visits
2,094 Pageviews
3.27 Pages/Visit
42.03% Bounce Rate
00:04:46 Avg. Time on Site
41.56% % New Visits
"Columbuzz.net so far this year:"
Shouldn't this come from Jeremy? And what about the Absolute Unique Visitors?
This is Joanna.
Google doesn't list it like that. For today and yesterday it says:
468 Visitors
That could be it.
And for so far this month:
1,761 Visitors
Google analytical might let you see this information. I am signed in and can't give you a password but you may not need one.
"And for so far this month:
1,761 Visitors"
So assuming that these are unique visitors, we're talking around 145/day. That's not very many for a website that's been around for years and is trying to sell advertising.
It varies through the month. I don't understand how it all works. Bob asked me to send you what I could.
Last 30 days:
9,923 Visits
34,425 Pageviews
3.47 Pages/Visit
39.77% Bounce Rate
00:05:26 Avg. Time on Site
28.51% % New Visits
3,346 Visitors
It is what it is.
The website changed a lot about two years ago when Bob got so involved and the staff grew. Before that visits were 30 to 50 per day.
The website in it's current state is less than two years old.
Don't forget the 50+ per day of people checking in to see what new filth Bob has posted.
That's a site "devoted" to the city of Columbus and advertises itself as such. (forget that it tends to be Bob's personal rant/vendetta/grudge vehicle.)
Dude's site doesn't advertise, posts opposing points of view, and serves only people tired Bob Freeman and his hateful, lying and destructive ways.
I'd say its leaps and bounds ahead of columbuzz for the amount of advertising it does (none).
By the way, Joanna, how can columbuzz try to pass itself off as a serious journalistic site when it posts pictures like the masked gunman. Do you support that? Did you tell Bob he was wrong to do that? Have you asked him how he can do that (it's not an isolated incident and you know it) and turn around and attack others for doing far less?
You need to understand Bob. I enjoy his rhetoric.
He has a drive to get the truth out. Read what he says and you might begin to understand. People are so blind to what really goes on around them.
Some of what people believe is posted by Bob is posted by others on the staff who never write much.
"You need to understand Bob. I enjoy his rhetoric."
You enjoy threats of violence?!?
"He has a drive to get the truth out. Read what he says and you might begin to understand."
Spoken like a true Bob-o-bot.
"People are so blind to what really goes on around them."
Ironic. You seem blind to what's going on around you.
Apples to apples, oranges to oranges, this blog is much bigger in theory that Columscum.
Threats of violence? Oh my! He said he thought the woman should be knocked on her butt and I agree with him.
Look into the violence she creates! She was absolutely wrong to act the way she did at that funeral home!
There numbers are impressive but a reflection of what? People who log on to see what non-sense Bob is spewing today? Log in to see what Bob and his minions are saying about others?
On this, I thing we can all agree, Bob provides hours of entertainment (mostly comedic) and is a true on line, blow by blow, study in mental illness. At least in seeing Bob's posts on Columscum, we can sort of decipher his mental state at any given moment.
Anonymous said...
Threats of violence? Oh my! He said he thought the woman should be knocked on her butt and I agree with him.
SO, YOU AND BOB AGREE THAT VIOLENCE IS APPROPRIATE FOR SOLVING ISSUES.
Look into the violence she creates! She was absolutely wrong to act the way she did at that funeral home!
WHAT VIOLENCE DID SHE CREATE? EXACTLY? ANSWER ME!
January 13, 2011 3:28 PM
Joanna is proof that delusional psychopaths gather with each other on Columscum.
She should never have gone to the funeral home. She should never have said anything like that to people.
She had no right to ask mourners about payment during the funeral services.
The way she runs that office is violence. Clients that get denied when more qualified than clients they help can testify to the violence she creates.
"He said he thought the woman should be knocked on her butt and I agree with him."
Violence is the solution for ignorant people.
"Look into the violence she creates! "
Huh? And what would that be?
"She was absolutely wrong to act the way she did at that funeral home!"
Reportedly. Do you believe everything Bob tells you? I guess you do, since he is your cult leader.
How about the other threats of violence from Bob? This for example: "I know where some of you live. You want to cross the line, then lets cross the fing line. It would be worth some time in jail to destroy your homes. And the lives of some of your family."
I'm not here for this. I came to give you some data that Bob said you asked to have. Have a nice day.
"There numbers are impressive"
Actually, they're not all that impressive. 3346 visitors the past 30 days is only 112 per day.
"I'm not here for this. I came to give you some data that Bob said you asked to have. Have a nice day."
Just like Bob. Run away when the questions get difficult.
There numbers are not significant in the context that they present them and Bob's babbling "lies" about how many people post there. As I have said before, there are many, many more people posting comments here than on Columscum.
That could be because ole Bob moderates the hell out of that page, I don't know but the numbers speak volumes. It's interesting that Bob is so concerned about controlling the content on his fledgling web-site that he edits, deletes and moderates heavily while over here on Dude, commentators are pretty much left alone to say whatever they wish.
With that in mind, you can count the number of Bob-lovers on here on three fingers. All in all, the truth about Bob and Columbscum is here for everyone to see, unedited but moderated to control filth.
"I'm not here for this. I came to give you some data that Bob said you asked to have. Have a nice day."
BOB AND THE BOTS NEVER, EVER ANSWER TOUGH QUESTIONS. THEY ALWAYS RETREAT BEHIND THE DIGITAL WALL OF COLUMSCUM TO SPEW THERE NONSENSE!
DUDES BLOG:
Here are the results from the first day and a half
206 Visits
54 Absolute Unique Visitors
811 Pageviews
3.94 Average Pageviews
00:07:27 Time on Site
26.21% Bounce Rate
16.50% New Visits
COLUMSCUM
Columbuzz.net yesterday and today:
640 Visits
2,094 Pageviews
3.27 Pages/Visit
42.03% Bounce Rate
00:04:46 Avg. Time on Site
41.56% % New Visits
The numbers for Columscum are not that good and are telling. If you subtract 1/3 of what they say they have to compare with Dude's 1.5 day report, there numbers SUCK.
Also, note that people spend less time on Columscum than on Dude. Considering the blog has 3 or 4 people according to Bob and gets very little publicity whereas everyone knows where to find fat-ass, I would say we are holding our own quite well against ole fatso!
The REAL Statistics of Columbuzz
YTD:
4,362 Dead Horses Beaten
15,447 Lies
3.54 News Stories Stolen/Day
40.21% Comments Deleted, Edited, or Faked
00:04:59 Avg. Time Laughing at Bob per Visit
30.38% Bob-o-bots with High School Diplomas
@Statistician #714
LOLOLOLOLOLOL!
I have no worries about sharing our data. We just need a good email Mr. Dude.
Just FYI the money if any Columbuzz makes will be turned back to the visitors as contest funds.
Advertising is more about the bringing in visitors, if you check the past stories we have given away over $200 over the past 2 years. Provided it has all be documented.
Just this January alone we have earned the following.
AdSense for Content top channels
Page impressions 14,293
Clicks 61
Page CTR 0.43%
Page eCPM [?] $1.56
Estimated earnings $22.31
"We just need a good email Mr. Dude."
Bob knows my email addy.
"Just FYI the money if any Columbuzz makes will be turned back to the visitors as contest funds."
So you're saying you have to bribe people to visit columbuzz?
"$22.31"
Don't spend all of that in one place.
Thanks.
YTD:
4,362 Dead Horses Beaten
15,447 Lies
3.54 News Stories Stolen/Day
40.21% Comments Deleted, Edited, or Faked
00:04:59 Avg. Time Laughing at Bob per Visit
30.38% Bob-o-bots with High School Diplomas
BREAKING NEWS---BREAKING NEWS---BREAKING NEWS
http://tinypic.com/r/6zwqkk/7
COLUMBUZZ HACKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://tinypic.com/r/6zwqkk/7
CAN YOU FIND THE HACKED CONTENT?
BREAKING NEWS---BREAKING NEWS---BREAKING NEWS
@ Bob Gets Hacked!
That's some wicked shit! Congrats!
HELL YES BOB GETS HACKED!! HELL F*ING YES!!!
Hey Bob, here's a hint:
contentEditable: "true"
Good luck finding it. Stay tuned for our next visit.
Techies Who HATE Bob!
HEY FAT BOY:
http://tinypic.com/r/2a68meu/7
Looks like someone we know made today's newspaper multiple times...and it ain't under the Orchids!
Freeman in The Republic
@ Joanna – thanks for posting the information on here. As for the violence you are condoning, you probably do not want to do that. It is unjustified as you are taking the words of a few people who in my opinion are bold faced liars. I know this b/c I know the woman involved. She would not have acted that way, period. The liars were probably upset by what they felt she represented - a worker in an office who provided assistance to this family in need. She would not have walked around asking why they didn’t pay, that was a stupid lie for them to say. To condone violence based off of what a few people say does not make sense. Instead, look at all the facts including that the person who asked for and received help was appreciative and did not once say she acted like that. She did not and still does not deserve to be talked about like this, especially to the point where someone is stupid enough to support physical harm. This is not something you should follow Bob on, no matter how much you like him as a person.
E
My husband is related to a few people who were there. I know she asked both of them why they did not help pay for it and she told each person there she wanted to be sure the trustees office got their money's worth.
My brother and his family are not liars. I heard this the day it happened and there was no reason to make anything up. That woman should be in jail for hat she did to those people.
"That woman should be in jail for hat she did to those people."
In jail? Seriously? And what exactly would be the criminal charge? Shouldn't Bob be in jail too with this threats of violence? Or does he get a pass from you?
I’m sorry you feel that way Joanna, but regardless of who told you what, it was a lie. I’m sure millions of people all over the world have unintentionally hurt or upset others feelings through out their lives, but to say they should be physically hurt or put in jail…not the adult or mature way to handle things. I do have a question though, your comment says it was your husband’s family that was there and told you what happened and yet you say your brother and his family are not liars? Probably just a mistype and you meant husband instead of brother. I am in no way calling your husband a liar, it’s not as if you said he was there and told you that. I guess I am calling his family that though, if they specifically said she asked them why they didn’t help pay for it. That is a lie.
E
My brother was there along with some of my husbands family. My brother confirmed what my husbands cousin said about what happened. This was the day of the services and people were surprised. It is not a lie.
He confirmed what? That she was there? Yes, she already said she was. Confirmed she asked him that? If so, it was a lie. She didn’t and wouldn’t have asked anyone why they didn’t pay for the funeral. Period. I know people have a lot of faults and people do things that would surprise others, but in this case, it wasn’t said. Say what you want, your brother wants or your husband’s family, once again it wasn’t said. There is not a doubt in my mind on this one, regardless of what is going on in yours. I hope you have a blessed day, I know mine is for knowing a woman like her.
E
She personally said to me, "Why was it necessary for the trstee to pay for this? Could the family not pitch in?"
I was there. She came up to my face and other persons close by and said this. It is true. You weren't there. I have no reasons to lie to anyone.
So Joanna, should I assume that you have no answers to my questions?
Joanna’s cousin - you’re right, I was not there. I am not arguing that point with you as that would be silly. What I am saying is that the woman in question would not have done that to a grieving family. Whether or not that makes you a liar or just confused eight years ago, I have no clue. But I do know it didn’t happen. I hope you have a good weekend.
E
Sandra Barkes was rude, condescending, and obnoxious that day and she should be fired.
Was it illegal? I'm not sure but civil and human rights were violated that day.
It did happen and I have many witnesses. I think it may be time for attorneys. Enough dead end speak here. Her denial only makes me angry. I held my tongue that day and I did not escort her out to the parking lot. I now wish I would have.
"Was it illegal? I'm not sure but civil and human rights were violated that day."
Exaggerate much? Civil and human rights? Get a grip. By the way, if you want to see rude, condescending, and obnoxious, just read Bob's comments.
And you still haven't answered my question about Bob. Shouldn't Bob be in jail too with this threats of violence? Or with his shenanigans with the odometer tampering device?
"I think it may be time for attorneys."
For what?
I've known Sandy for many years. She is not the person you and bob say she is. Remember the letters written? All one has to do is read those and they'll know who was telling the truth and who was reasonable (I'd bet my life on Sandy)
regardless. You have condoned violence against her. You and Bob. If something were to
happen to her YOU will be held responsible. Maybe publicly, maybe not. Maybe personally, maybe not. You and Bob will not be able to escape the justice srved on you by your own mind at 3am (assuming you are capable of introspection) and by God when you are judged.
She committed violence upon those mourners that day. To go in and ridicule and to belittle as she did was outrageous and unforgivable. No human should have had to knock her down. God should have.
And if something happens to her or anyone else, it will have to be proven that Bob and I had anything to do with it.
Bob said she should have been 'knocked on her ass.' That's not a threat. He said if he had been there women there would have. That's not a threat.
If someone beats her to death, they will still have to connect him to the crime. He never threatened her or anyone else.
Most of the posts you have on here 'signed' by Bob were not written by Bob. Check the IP addresses.
"She committed violence upon those mourners that day."
You have a strange definition of violence. By the way, I don't remember Jesus saying anything was unforgivable, at least in his eyes. Maybe God should knock you down for being ridiculous.
"Most of the posts you have on here 'signed' by Bob were not written by Bob."
And you know this how? Bob has admitted to many of them on columbuzz.
Bob works and is off the computer much of the day. Most of those posts 'by' him are posted when he is off the internet. I sit at a desk all day and see posts pop up. I call him and asked why he posted and he does not know what I mean.
"Bob said she should have been 'knocked on her ass.' That's not a threat. He said if he had been there women there would have. That's not a threat."
Maybe not, but it is advocating violence against women.
"He never threatened her or anyone else."
Not true.
"Bob works and is off the computer much of the day. Most of those posts 'by' him are posted when he is off the internet. I sit at a desk all day and see posts pop up. I call him and asked why he posted and he does not know what I mean."
Bob doesn't remember a lot of what he posts (or he just claims he doesn't remember), especially when he's manic.
Maybe GOD didn’t see it the way you are right now. I’m personally am not going to be stupid enough to say what GOD should have done to a human being. That seems to be a pretty big presumption to make. Maybe you should pray on it? You may even want to throw in an apology to him, just a thought. Sandra is a good person, a GOD fearing person and in no way committed violence at that funeral.
By the way, Bob posts stuff on Columbuzz all the time during the day. But I am sure you already know that…
E
Not when he is working. Maybe on his lunch break. He was on a lot this week because he was home with the flu for three days.
State a time when bob couldn't have posted something here and supposedly did. I bet I can find a Bob post on columbuzz at the same time. He's not that smart. I've seen "anonymous" posts here that I know were Bob. Funny thing is, there were "bob" posts within 10 minutes of that on Columbuzz.
I post anonymously here because I know if bob knew my name he would attack me and my family. Everyone who knows Bob knows that too.
"Not when he is working. Maybe on his lunch break. He was on a lot this week because he was home with the flu for three days. "
The worst posts from Bob were made on Sunday, Dec. 5 in the afternoon. Was Bob at work that day?
Has he said they were his posts? If he said they were his, then they were. But unless he has confirmed he made the others, he probably didn't.
"Has he said they were his posts?"
Yes, he did. Have you read the ones from Dec. 5? They are very disturbing.
Bob Freeman is like a fat (OK, a very fat) poodle with a Napoleon complex.
I believe Bob once commented something to the effect that he gets online from his vehicle during work hours. So, even if he is "at work", he can access the web and post and apparently does.
He probably gets on-line in between cleaning the shitters.
When he was running for trustee he bragged that with his blackberry he would be available 24/7. Think he can't find the time to type a lie or attack a perceived enemy?
His friends should be careful. They are defending the indefensible. The more mud he slings at people, the worse his supporters look.
Post a Comment