The goal of this blog is to blow the whistle on the so called whistle blowers at columbuzz.net.
Monday, July 18, 2011
Bob vs Bob 21.0
Bob #1:
"I stated earlier that I have people in my family with drug issues and I wouldn't comment on a son having a drug issue. No parent can stop that in this day and age."
Fred's nephew, Dude I think Bob has an insatiable need to attack someone. He can't attack Fred Barkes any longer, so I guess Tim Miracle is his new target.
Bob Freeman is copying comments made here, and pasting them to Columbuzz under non-creative fake names, as if they were comments submitted to Columbuzz.
Bob is an immature imbecile with no meaningful life of his own.
I think if anyone ever slapped Bob Freeman around a little bit, he would be clueless as to why someone would do that to him.
"Besides, READ Casper, READ. That statement tells you to see how much help you will receive if they think you have drugs. It doesn't say they won't or they will. It says 'see how much.'"
Bob, Bob, Bob. This is EXACTLY the kind of f'd-up reasoning that resulted in a law suit being filed against you.
Have you been sipping on Anti-Freeze most of your life???
"Bob, Bob, Bob. This is EXACTLY the kind of f'd-up reasoning that resulted in a law suit being filed against you."
He really thinks that if he doesn't explicitly say something and just implies it that it's not the same thing. It's an excuse that I would expect from a child.
"I know that I had my hand in the cookie jar, Mom, but I hadn't actually taken any cookie yet. So you can't be sure why my hand was really in there."
Bob, an excuse like that didn't work for you then. It won't work for you now.
"About as important as Fred Barkes' nephew doing Fred's dirty work breaking an agreement that he signed."
I have no idea what Bob is talking about here. If he is implying that I know what the agreement was, then he's wrong, AGAIN. I have no idea what it was.
Bob just apparently deleted my comment that proved he looked like a dumbass for his so called "reporting". And then altered his previous reply to me so it would actually make sense.
What would this guy do if he was forced to debate people in a fair and open forum?
"What would this guy do if he was forced to debate people in a fair and open forum?"
I suspect that's one reason he became involved with columbuzz, so he could control the debate. It seems he can't handle the fact that he can't control the debate here on my blog.
Barkes' son, David, was not arrested on new meth charges. The paper had it wrong. I called the court house (that would be called investigation should Bob wonder) and found there was an alleged probation violation and he was released 2 days later.
I don't know what the violation was but Bob should not report it like he was caught with drugs again. Perhaps the Barkes' should introduce David to their lawyer.
Cyber harassment and cyber stalking are often used synonymously to describe the actions of persons who relentlessly pursue others online with the intention of frightening or embarrassing the victim. Sometimes a harasser intends to teach the victim a lesson or solicit information from the victim, and stalkers generally want revenge or attention.
There is no universal legal definition of cyber harassment, but it typically is defined as repeated, unsolicited, threatening behavior by a person or group using mobile or Internet technology with the intent to bother, terrify, intimidate, humiliate, threaten, harass or stalk someone else. The harassment can take place in any electronic environment where communication with others is possible, such as on social networking sites, on message boards, in chat rooms or through email. Posting a general opinion on a discussion board or in a forum is not considered cyber harassment
"Barkes' son, David, was not arrested on new meth charges. The paper had it wrong. I called the court house (that would be called investigation should Bob wonder) and found there was an alleged probation violation and he was released 2 days later."
That's how Bob investigates. He just reads the paper.
Question for you... Did Ancestry.com drop advertising on YOUR site or did someone report to them regarding your site and what you were doing with family info?
24 comments:
columbuzz is faking comments again:
Fred's nephew, Dude
I think Bob has an insatiable need to attack someone. He can't attack Fred Barkes any longer, so I guess Tim Miracle is his new target.
Bob doesn't want to mess with those Miracle boys. They were hellyuns back in the day...
More mean and nasty attacks by Bob Freeman. Big surprise there.
Bob, you have the mentality of a child.
Comment on columbuzz:
"tim miracle is not being attacked, he is being shown for who he truly is... this is a "whistle blowing" site after all."
That may be true, but columbuzz is not a legitimate whistle blowing site. It's a joke.
"I wonder how you would view Bob if YOUR loved ones had been among tim's victims?"
Typical bot response: the ends justify the means. By the way, I would view Bob exactly the same way. He's an idiot.
columbuzz is faking comments again
Bob Freeman is copying comments made here, and pasting them to Columbuzz under non-creative fake names, as if they were comments submitted to Columbuzz.
Bob is an immature imbecile with no meaningful life of his own.
I think if anyone ever slapped Bob Freeman around a little bit, he would be clueless as to why someone would do that to him.
"Bob, you have the mentality of a child."
Yes. Yes he does.
BOB THE VILLAGE IDIOT FREEMAN SAID THIS...
"Besides, READ Casper, READ. That statement tells you to see how much help you will receive if they think you have drugs. It doesn't say they won't or they will. It says 'see how much.'"
Bob, Bob, Bob.
This is EXACTLY the kind of f'd-up reasoning that resulted in a law suit being filed against you.
Have you been sipping on Anti-Freeze most of your life???
http://www.columbuzz.net/index.php?news=6509
Sounds like extremely important whistle blowing, along the lines of moldy bread, illegally parked cars, and hot grills.
"Bob, Bob, Bob.
This is EXACTLY the kind of f'd-up reasoning that resulted in a law suit being filed against you."
He really thinks that if he doesn't explicitly say something and just implies it that it's not the same thing. It's an excuse that I would expect from a child.
"I know that I had my hand in the cookie jar, Mom, but I hadn't actually taken any cookie yet. So you can't be sure why my hand was really in there."
Bob, an excuse like that didn't work for you then. It won't work for you now.
I have been doing some family history research on the Freemans.
Here is what I found:
http://imageshack.us/f/823/freemantree.jpg/
Bob wrote on columbuzz:
"About as important as Fred Barkes' nephew doing Fred's dirty work breaking an agreement that he signed."
I have no idea what Bob is talking about here. If he is implying that I know what the agreement was, then he's wrong, AGAIN. I have no idea what it was.
Bob wrote on columbuzz:
"Some have wives that work at Christian Schools."
Bob sounds like a real man, involving wives in our dispute.
Bobby Freeman and Jamie Johns were sitting in a tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g first came love, then came marriage, then came Jason Vest in a baby carriage!
Bob just apparently deleted my comment that proved he looked like a dumbass for his so called "reporting". And then altered his previous reply to me so it would actually make sense.
What would this guy do if he was forced to debate people in a fair and open forum?
"What would this guy do if he was forced to debate people in a fair and open forum?"
I suspect that's one reason he became involved with columbuzz, so he could control the debate. It seems he can't handle the fact that he can't control the debate here on my blog.
Barkes' son, David, was not arrested on new meth charges. The paper had it wrong. I called the court house (that would be called investigation should Bob wonder) and found there was an alleged probation violation and he was released 2 days later.
I don't know what the violation was but Bob should not report it like he was caught with drugs again. Perhaps the Barkes' should introduce David to their lawyer.
What!?! More possible libel from Bob!! I'm shocked!
Bozos named Bob maybe should take note of this.
Cyber harassment and cyber stalking are often used synonymously to describe the actions of persons who relentlessly pursue others online with the intention of frightening or embarrassing the victim. Sometimes a harasser intends to teach the victim a lesson or solicit information from the victim, and stalkers generally want revenge or attention.
There is no universal legal definition of cyber harassment, but it typically is defined as repeated, unsolicited, threatening behavior by a person or group using mobile or Internet technology with the intent to bother, terrify, intimidate, humiliate, threaten, harass or stalk someone else. The harassment can take place in any electronic environment where communication with others is possible, such as on social networking sites, on message boards, in chat rooms or through email. Posting a general opinion on a discussion board or in a forum is not considered cyber harassment
I have a feeling Mrs. Dude may be spending some time on the phone tomorrow discussing the matter with the proper authorities.
Yes, yes I will!
"Barkes' son, David, was not arrested on new meth charges. The paper had it wrong. I called the court house (that would be called investigation should Bob wonder) and found there was an alleged probation violation and he was released 2 days later."
That's how Bob investigates. He just reads the paper.
Uh, Bob... NOT threats! and erasing the "name" of our son is not any better. PHONE CALLS TOMORROW.
In CAPS cause it is true. LOL
Question for you... Did Ancestry.com drop advertising on YOUR site or did someone report to them regarding your site and what you were doing with family info?
Hope someone stored screen shots with our son's "name" and the Ancestry.com support banner. I may need it tomorrow.
Post a Comment