Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Bob Does It Again!!!

Yet another picture of an anus right next to a restaurant ad!


23 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh my, I got choked laughing at that one. :D

Anonymous said...

That anus needs Preperation H. Lots of swellling.

Anonymous said...

The only difference is the anus serves a purpose.

Anonymous said...

Where's the photo of Bob and his wife?

Anonymous said...

More bad grammar from the undereducated and unsophisticated...

COLUMBUZZ: "Just in-case you wasn't aware, your commute will be detoured if you travel down Central Ave near Kroger."

Anonymous said...

COLUMBASH: "Side note, you know how you can tell you're a celebrity? When people talk about you they mention both your first and last name. For example, Jim Carey, Jennifer Anistan, John Mellencamp; not Rupert they call him by his first name only."

I guess the Columbuzz idiots never heard of Madonna, Liberace, Cher, Elvis, etc.

Anonymous said...

I will say this, his advertisers tell me where not to spend my money.

Anonymous said...

it seems like they are taking a lot of photos lately from places where it is questionable / not allowed, like they are trying to push limits and dare anyone to say something so they can have a new place to complain about. shocking.

Anonymous said...

The brainiacs at columbuzz have done it again: "Mental Woman thought she could fly with help from speeding car"

"Mental"? Are you implying she is developementally handicapped? Even menatlly retarded (though that has fallen out of favor recently)? Mental? I'm not one for overuse of political correctness, but mental? That's a term we used as third graders and knew it was wrong then. GROW UP!

After they literally added insult to injury they joke that she "took the plunge and left the top of the vehicle, with a big smile thinking "I can fly" ". Do they know what she was thinking? This is little more than a child who, it sounds, is seriously injured and columbuzzards make jokes like that.

Disgusting, childish, and very poor use of the english language.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 10:37 Dolly, Reba.

Dude said...

"Jeremy" is such a child:
"Is it your kid on Columbuzz newest article? HAHA if so"

Dude said...

"Jeremy" wrote on facebook:
"Um, he is one ugly fat man who thinks by acting the way he does brings positive attitude around whomever he is around. It doesn't and is seriously annoying. He might look better if he was to shave his head"

Is he talking about Bob here?

Anonymous said...

So it appears joanna wrote the snide comments about the injured girl. Fitting. The person who posted a pic of a starbucks employee claiming that person was negligent, without personal knowledge of the situation (according to bob) is now ridiculing a severely injured girl. If that girl doesn't recover, I wonder if joanna will lie awake regretting her comments. Probably not considering she is a bob freeman follower. Self awareness is not a burden they apparently bear.

Anonymous said...

@ Anonymous 6:24 I agree that the use of "mental" is uncalled for. Most people have come to grips with the fact that their are many people that are ill. Yes, mood disorders are an illness. Just like diabetes. Mood disorders require taking meds for life. You don't just decide you have "grown out of your diagnosis". It doesn't work that way.
If Bob would spend some time sitting in on a DBSA or other meeting of the sort, he may realize he has a chemical imbalance that you learn to cope with day in and day out. Jeremy, make sure you go also, you can be Bob's support and Bob can be yours... Just sayin'...

Dude said...

Lucy wrote on columbuzz:
"This article is such crap. I don't know who wrote it, but it really bites to have poo on here...Shame on you..."

Um, Lucy, where have you been? Columbuzz posts crap all the time. Are you just now noticing?

Dude said...

charlie wrote on columbuzz:
"Well, I watched the video and it didn't say anything about the cop using the man as a speed bump, nor did it say anything about the cop texting, using an ipad or being drunk.. Just another article on this website where the writer spews his venom and displays his agenda. Real professional guys."

Charlie gets it.

Dude said...

Lucy wrote on columbuzz:
"this is tabloid writing, this puts a huge negative mark on this site. I hope it's removed. I thought the buzz was better than this crap..."

"No, I'm not a moderator here, but this article is tabloid material, making this site look like crap."

Where has she been!?!

Nielsen said...

"Where has she been!?!"

Lucy is a mixed-up ding-a-ling who fades in and out of reality as often as she blinks.

I don't care for her at all, but I would love to watch every episode, if they made a sitcom based on her.

Discover TRUTH said...

LOL

Bob wrote and posted yet another 'story' about his personal adventures in mowing and mulching.

It must be the highlight of his lengthy career as a dimwit with few skills and fantasies and aspirations of fame and fortune.

Bob: "It's funny, there were few weeds coming up in the red mulch but a lot in the black mulch. They not only grow more in the black, they show up more in the black. A good reason to change the entire project to all red mulch, as it used to be."

The Bob Reason doesn't match the real and truthful reason...it looks like crap!
Even an idiot (B.D.Freeman) can see that.

Anonymous said...

"Tabloid Columbuzz - Like it or not, it brings the readers."

First of all, PLEASE go attend an English grammar class if you insist on writing articles. My 12-year-old niece writes better than you.

Second of all, I'm glad that you all are finally admitting that Columbuzz is just a tabloid AT BEST. That article is full of a lot of false information. For instance, The Republic clearly stated why they ran that suicide story and it wasn't because of the amount of officers that responded. Learn to read please.

Both "articles" you all wrote about the officer hitting the man with his vehicle were extremely disrespectful to all parties involved. It's apparent now that you were just writing those things for shock value. Shame on you.

Also, before anyone from Columbuzz claims that they didn't write it, that's irrelevant. You approved the submission and posted it on the front page.

Secret Santa said...

Lucy and Misty the voice of reason at Columbutts? Whoda thunk it? I think the reason is that both know people in the story itself and can (or think they can) verify or dispute part of it. If the same story had been written about someone they didn't know (or something near and dear to their hearts such as being a parent or about your buddy who is running for office) , I don't think they would be objecting.

Columbuzzards have this mistaken notion that not crediting the writer will protect them from liability. They are incorrect. It would make the owner of the site liable for approving it and then he (Nathan) would be scrambling around trying to blame Bob for the approval and the author for the words.

Bob's Still A Classy Guy said...

"Classy" Bob Freeman says:

"Does it make it wrong for Columbuzz to post the article calling Jeremy a "speed bump", this is debatable..."

--- Its not debatable. It was a classless act from classless people. Just like calling the young lady who was hurt in North Vernon "mental" was wrong and a classless act.

It is possible to have intelligent discourse about the wisdom of their actions. In fact, there are few who would argue the act of "surfing" on a car or jumping out of a moving vehicle is anything less than stupid.

However, those who post at columbuzz have repeatedly shown themselves to be extremely juvenile at best and hateful at worst. Perhaps they just lack the intelligence, creativity and/or vocabulary to make a point without calling people names.

They further their transgressions by insinuating the deputy may be at fault.

Bob Freeman: "If the x-wife didn't leave the scene of an accident then Jeremy wouldn't have been stuck, I am curious has she been arrested. This is a felony charge I think."

--- Do you know the time table? If you do not then you do not know whether she had time to stop and you are once again accusing someone of something without the facts.

I like how Bob tries to explain she left the scene of an accident and should have been arrested. Bob has never been wrong about the law. (See his HIPPA violations, odometer tampering, getting sued etc.) 1) It takes time for someone to safely slow down, legally turn around, and then return on a dark highway. 2) I doubt if legally there was an accident until he was hit and she did return.

Bob Freeman "Ever since I took over this petty site a few years back, the traffic has increased."

--- So today he is claiming he took over the website. Yesterday he was just a contributor. Tomorrow he might claim he's never heard of columbuzz. *** of course Bob's name isn't on the article, probably in some fruitless effort to distance himself should he be sued again. Everyone knows its he that wrote the article.***

Bob Freeman: "...it can't be undone and we should respect the dead."

--- Like calling him a speed bumb. Keep it civil columbuzz.

B.F. : "Articles the media writes in the beginning of any accident, crime, event are often vague in all the facts; leading to speculation of anything."

--- Columbuzz articles don't lead to speculation. Columbuzz articles are speculation. There is a huge difference. See if you can find it, Bob. Its like the children's tests/games. Take 3 articles on any subject but reputable sources and a columbuzz article. Read them, and then sing to yourself "One of these articles is not like the other ones." A 3rd grader could find the grammar differences and a 5th grader could find the content/reliability differences.

BF: "...The actual article about Jeremy was also listed here, but that wasn't even a concern for people to know exact details.

People whether you want to think it or not want to read the "Tabloid" articles. The nicey-nice articles don't pan to well on any site."

--- Translation: Telling the truth and reporting the facts that are known at the time isn't flashy enough. Columbuzz prefers lies, unfounded accusations and wild speculation. Of course we all knew that, but Bob has just admitted to it.

In other words, Bob just stated that columbuzz can not be trusted.

BF: "...just because you like the officer who ran over Jeremy doesn't mean the officer wasn't in the wrong somewhere."

--- Once again Bob is doing the whole "prove he wasn't in the wrong" routine. You can't prove a negative. You have to prove he did something wrong. Of course Bob only believes in that when it comes to himself.

Elizabeth Boyer Lowe said...

Tabloid Columbuzz - Like it or not, it brings the readers.


BOB FREEMAN
SEP 19 2009
"There are few people in this world that are around children less than I am. I mean EVER. I am NEVER around any kids."

My father was fearful people might think he was a pervert because his father was. He was very guarded about it, and in turn I have always been careful not to put myself in a postion to be accused of it..

WELL BOB WHY DONT YOU TELL US WHY YOU DONT WANT TO BE AROUND KIDS? SHOULD WE THINK YOU HAVE BAD IDEAS WITH KIDS OR WHAT?
MAYBE THAT COULD BE THE NEXT SCUMBUZZ STORY OF THE WEEK......
NOW THAT IM SURE WOULD KICK YOU READER CLICKER WAY UP TO THE TOP........
MAYBE SOMEONE SHOULD WRITE THIS AND POST IT...