Friday, June 3, 2011

Mr. Anon-o-Bobby-mous

http://www.columbuzz.net/index.php?news=6244

Mr. Anon-o-Bobby-mous wrote on columbuzz:
"We also have proof that you have been calling our advertisers and harassing them because they advertise with us."

Expressing your opinion is harassment?  Then I guess Bob is guilty of about a billion counts of harassment.

"Are we supposed to back off reporting on the fire department AND put up with harassment from fire department members like yourself AND keep our mouths shut about it? That isn't going to happen."

What about your harassment of pretty much everyone in the trustee office?

"You need to back off now or the real fun will begin. You don't want to play games with us because we can play well since we know who you are. It's your decision. Keep up your stupidity and we can play."

More lame threats from Bob.

"The big question now is do we start calling and harassing you since you have a banner ad on columbuzz? That only seems fair to me."

Sure Bob, that makes perfect sense, to lunatics.

"Try us. Keep up your crap. I wonder how much we could post about you and your life. It would all be true. Have you any skeletons in your closet Chris C.? Anyone in your life have any? We can dig, if you like."

Bob, you don't dig.  You don't investigate.  You just plop yourself in front of your computer and wait for the "anonymous" emails to trickle in.

34 comments:

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

Mr. Anon-o-Bobby-mous is hilarious. He has already deleted his comment.

Anonymous said...

Yes, we've proved what we wanted too... have fun!

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"Yes, we've proved what we wanted too"

And what would that be Jeremy? That you and Bob are incompetent moderators?

Anonymous said...

If that makes you feel superior to us then yes "dude".

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

I am superior to you and Bob. Most people are, except for the bots obviously.

Anonymous said...

Identifying Bob through his rants is more accurate than handwriting analysis.

Anonymous said...

Good.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

That's why you should follow the advice of someone who is obviously smarter than you. Punt Bob from columbuzz and convert it from a tabloid into a community information site. Then you'll have all the advertisers you want. Simple.

Anonymous said...

*******Bob Freeman: "You need to back off now or the real fun will begin. You don't want to play games with us because we can play well since we know who you are. It's your decision. Keep up your stupidity and we can play."

"Try us. Keep up your crap. I wonder how much we could post about you and your life. It would all be true. Have you any skeletons in your closet Chris C.? Anyone in your life have any? We can dig, if you like."*********


Chris Chambers, you should contact the prosecutor's office. Threatening to harrass you if you complain to an advertiser is Intimidation, Class A misdemeanor:

IC 35-45-2-1
Intimidation
Sec. 1. (a) A person who communicates a threat to another person, with the intent:
(2) that the other person be placed in fear of retaliation for a prior lawful act commits intimidation, a Class A misdemeanor.

Anonymous said...

LOL, he never mentioned specifically it was Mr. Chambers, also Bob's name wasn't associated with that comment. Also I don't see any threat greater than you Merc stating you wanted to thump Bobs face.

Writing an article isn't threatening either... that is funny. How many more straws you have to yank.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"LOL, he never mentioned specifically it was Mr. Chambers, also Bob's name wasn't associated with that comment."

Jeremy, you are becoming even more of a weasel than Bob.

"Also I don't see any threat greater than you Merc stating you wanted to thump Bobs face."

Have you read Bob's comments on here from Dec. 5?

Anonymous said...

1. He threatened to harass Chris.
2. The threat came from a moderator of columbuzz. Easy enough to prove unless you dump your hard drives again.
3. They can go after both Jeremy and Bob. How long do you think it would take to find out which one is the author?
4. Ask any criminal lawyer.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"They can go after both Jeremy and Bob. How long do you think it would take to find out which one is the author?"

Bob and Jeremy both think they are above the law. I believe they will soon learn a painful lesson.

Anonymous said...

Correction. Easy enough to prove ESPECIALLY if you dump the hard drives again. Its called evidence of guilty conscience.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

And now Bob has deleted all of the Chris Chambers articles.

Anonymous said...

Which isn't surprising because the previous commenter was correct. This matter should be referred to the prosecutor's office. The interesting thing is that since Jeremy is now the registered owner of the site and the comment was by an admin - all they have to do is legally force him to reveal who the threats were from.

Online harassments and threats are being taken especially seriously by prosecutors right now.

Anonymous said...

I told you we've proved our point. Bob doesn't do everything on Columbuzz, I manage when I want too!

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"I told you we've proved our point."

And your point was what exactly? That you can threaten people? We already knew that.

"Bob doesn't do everything on Columbuzz, I manage when I want too!"

You're right Jeremy. I'm very sorry I didn't give you the credit that you so richly deserve.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"This matter should be referred to the prosecutor's office."

I agree 100%. It's way past time for Bob to be prosecuted for his threats.

Bob is Boring said...

The comment business appears to be very slow over at the buzzards site, wonder why that might be?

Secret Santa said...

Is this some ill-advised attempt at getting Bob off the hook for the lawsuit and things that go on there. "Bob's name is no longer on the logo, Jeremy's name is on the registration now, and he has proven he has administrative powers there, so it CAN'T Be Bob. If that is it, Jeremy you might have just proved yourself to be dumber than Bob.

First of all, what is now isn't what necessarily was when the things happened. Even if there is proof you COULD have done them then, you are putting your neck on the chopping block. Do you think that because there is no proof WHICH of you did those things, you will both get off the hook?

I guess when your back's against the wall, you will try grasping at straws to protect yourself.

Secret Santa said...

I reckon I should take you under my tutelage, Jeremy. I believe in Civil court (unlike criminal court) reasonable doubt doesn't apply as much. If you two are listed as owners, you both will have to pay whatever the settlement is. I hope you are ready and I hope McDonald's pays you well.

Anonymous said...

I get paid surprisingly well being a assembly line lead technician.

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

You better start saving your money now. You'll need it to pay your lawyers.

Secret Santa said...

It seems ironic that McDonald's mascot is a clown.

Anonymous said...

Assembly line technician. That is laughable. You put the secret sauce on Big Macs. Meanwhile, Bob puts his secret sauce on you.

Merc said...

Train wreck.

Getting closer daily.

Anonymous said...

Jeremy is a dumbass!

Anonymous said...

"Is this some ill-advised attempt at getting Bob off the hook for the lawsuit and things that go on there. "Bob's name is no longer on the logo, Jeremy's name is on the registration now, and he has proven he has administrative powers there, so it CAN'T Be Bob. If that is it, Jeremy you might have just proved yourself to be dumber than Bob."

Secret Santa is right. Bob is setting Jeremy up for a fall. Bob's already gotten himself sued. He doesn't want to risk another suit. That is why the site is now in Jeremy's name. That is also why Bob has started ranting as "Mr. Anon" etc.

Jeremy, you may have started with noble ideals but you are letting yourself become Bob's patsy. Think about it.

Anonymous said...

Jeremy? Think? HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"Jeremy, you may have started with noble ideals but you are letting yourself become Bob's patsy. Think about it."

I think Jeremy's too far gone at this point to think clearly about it. It looks like he lets Bob, his cult leader, do all of his thinking for him.

Anonymous said...

While checking columbuzz for any recent trash (and any new advertisers to boycott)I actually saw an article I was interested in reading. When I tried, I got this message:

"This story is restricted to a certain type of member, click register to signup or login. Thanks."

Restricted to a "certain type" of person? You mean the type of person Bob Freeman can track and harass? We already know he tracks IP addresses of visitors. Why would I sign up so he knows my email address? If I signed up and left a critical opinion would he threaten me like he has Chris Chambers? I finally saw 1 article worth reading (that I had not seen elsewhere) and they wanted my personal information.

I could understand if they were trying to make money off of columbuzz but they claim they are not. Wait a minute......hmmm.....

Anonymous said...

Bob Freeman is the Columbus town clown. Jeremy Putz is the Columbus town IDIOT. Both provide hours of non-stop comedic entertainment and both are, without question, unadulterated trash!

Anonymous said...

What article and we will unlock it...