http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=5503
Statements from Judy Johns Jackson:
"This post is not accurate."
What?!? A post on columbuzz not accurate? I'm shocked!
"we need to stop saying things that aren’t true. These city crews have worked hard and they have worked some very long hours to keep our streets clear of ice and snow – we should be thanking them not spreading rumors about them."
And columbuzz needs to stop posting things that aren't true. But if they started doing that, columbuzz would be reduced to a blank web page.
117 comments:
Bob Freeman is infamous for heresay and innuendo. Bob wrong again. Not a surprise!
Bob didn't post this one. He fixed it. We have one who says it happened and one who says it didn't. We don't yet know who is accurate.
It's funny that they heavily moderate, edit and delete comments from everyone else but cannot even proof-read or check facts before going to press. There reporting is grossly irresponsible, unethical and is worse than a high school newspaper. In fact, Columscum should be called the
Columbus Inquirer!
"We have one who says it happened and one who says it didn't. We don't yet know who is accurate."
Why did you automatically assume that it happened?
The content that is published on Columbuzz could contain rumors, speculation, assumptions, opinions, and factual information. Postings may contain erroneous or inaccurate information. We can legally operate this site this way! If you are offended or violated read our F&Q's or don't visit.
Still not sure what an F&Q is.
Me either, Dude.
For a website that supposedly makes "whistle blowing easy", nothing could be farther from the truth. First, the site is moderated by the heavy-handed Bob Freeman. CNN and CBS are not moderated as heavily as Columbuzz.
What this means is that any "story" a person wishes to post must get past Bob Freeman. Bob has set himself up as the gatekeeper if you will. I am curious as to what makes him think he is the expert on "blowing." I guess it could be because he has blown 5 elections. It reeks of insanity that someone who was been clearly dissed by the voters 5 times would see himself as something of a know it all which he clearly does. Bob has a comment for everything.
The people who participate in Columbuzz are probably fooled by there initial observation into thinking it is worthwhile of legitimate discussion. The rest are as delusional, disenfranchised and stupid as Bob Freeman.
hearsay, not heresay.
their, not there, repeatedly on this website.
It is an open forum where people post stuff. If that stuff is proven wrong that proof is posted too.
You prove what someone says they witnessed before reporting it. By then it's 3 days old.
You run your website the manner in which you wish and we will run ours as we wish.
Bob does a fantastic job and we plan no changes.
"hearsay, not heresay.
their, not there, repeatedly on this website."
Herman, I don't think you should be giving out English lessons.
"It is an open forum where people post stuff."
Lie. You deleted my posts.
"If that stuff is proven wrong that proof is posted too."
Lie. I've proven many things wrong and you won't post it.
"You prove what someone says they witnessed before reporting it. "
So someone can say anything about anyone (except about Bob and his Bots), and you will post it? Sounds (un)reasonable.
"Bob does a fantastic job and we plan no changes."
That just shows your lack of intelligence. A fantastic job of what exactly? Lying? Threatening people with violence? Posting hypocritical nonsense?
Bob does a fantastic job and we plan no changes.
GOOD! I WOULDN'T WANT IT ANY OTHER WAY! YOU, HERMAN, AND BOB FREEMAN ARE PRECISELY THE TYPE OF IGNORANT ASSHOLES THE COMMUNITY NEEDS TO BE WARNED ABOUT. YOUR SILENCE MAKES YOU POTENTIALLY DEADLY. AT LEAST IF YOU ARE POSTING AWAY ON YOUR FLEDGLING WEB-SITE, YOU ARE LEAVING ALMOST EVERYONE ALONE!
JERK!
What rock did that bastard crawl out from under?
Herman said...
hearsay, not heresay.
their, not there, repeatedly on this website.
FROM YOU? ROFLMAO!
It is an open forum where people post stuff.
LIE. IT IS NOT, IN ANYWAY, AN OPEN FORUM. AN OPEN FORUM ALLOWS FOR OPEN COMMENT AND IS NOT EDITED AND DELETED AT SOME ASSHOLES WHIM!
If that stuff is proven wrong that proof is posted too.
SO, IT'S AN ON-LINE BITCH FIGHT!
You prove what someone says they witnessed before reporting it.
NO, YOU PROVE IT! YOU ARE THE ONE WHO CLAIMS TO BE "WHISTLE BLOWING." (I SUSPECT THE ONLY BLOWING YOU ARE DOING IS BOB.)
You run your website the manner in which you wish and we will run ours as we wish.
THANKS FOR YOUR PERMISSION YOU RETARDED F***ING MORON!
Bob does a fantastic job and we plan no changes.
A FANTASTIC JOB BY WHOSE STANDARDS? YOUR STANDARDS ARE A JOKE.
The funny thing, if I understand the genesis of the site correctly, Bob created this site. "Dude" decided to do what no else has done and create a site to counter Bob's lies, innuendos and threats. Until "Dude" started this site and it became popular, Bob was allowed to post whatever whim he desired without oversight, with public outcry and without repercussion. Bob doesn't want to admit it, but Dude's site has actually forced columbuzz to comply with plagiarism and copyright laws. He refuses to post this web address because he might lose some of his viewers who actually might think he is some sort of journalist bound by professional ethics.
The funny thing is that Bob perpetuates this blog. I'm sure Dude has better things to do. But, as long as Bob continues his attacks and lies people like Dude will be around.
Bob, you've opened your own Pandora's box. The passion with which people hate you should be telling. You are not doing good. One of your own supporters said "you have to understand Bob" and she enjoys your rhetoric. If your motives have to be explained, if you are someone you "have to understand", and if your communication is viewed as "rhetoric" by your own supporters, then you have failed at whatever it is you are trying to accomplish at columbuzz. Unless you are trying get attention no matter the method. Even 2 year olds learn the difference between bad attention and good attention.
"Unless you are trying get attention no matter the method."
I believe this is really what they want since Bob craves attention to feed his huge ego. Or maybe Bob, Herman, Jeremy, and some of the other bots are just outcasts of society and this is their way of getting revenge.
Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...
"Unless you are trying get attention no matter the method."
I believe this is really what they want since Bob craves attention to feed his huge ego. Or maybe Bob, Herman, Jeremy, and some of the other bots are just outcasts of society and this is their way of getting revenge.
January 15, 2011 3:40 PM
IT COULD VERY POSSIBLY BE A DANGEROUS COMBINATION. BOB'S EGO IS OUT OF CONTROL AND HAS BEEN FOR QUITE SOME TIME. HE SEES HIMSELF AS SOME KIND OF KNOW-IT-ALL SAVIOR OF THE PEOPLE AND WE ARE ALL SERVED BY HIS MASSIVE INTELLECT. (I JUST THREW UP A LITTLE SAYING THAT.)
WITHOUT QUESTION, BOB AND HIS PALS ARE OUTCASTS. THEY SEE COLUMSCUM AS THERE VERSION OF "THE REPUBLIC" AND THEY USE THERE FLEDGLING WEB-SITE TO GO AFTER THERE ENEMIES ACTUAL AND/OR PERCEIVED.
"You prove what someone says they witnessed before reporting it. By then it's 3 days old."
Better to be three days old and accurate than a total lie and beating someone else to the punch. Imagine if the Republic, WishTV etc. followed this same policy. They would not only be in the position of being sued, but their accuracy would be diminished. What good is a news organization that worries more about getting the story first, but not being able to depend on whether what they run is true or not?
Sure, there are those who get off on reading all this stuff (true or not), but do you really want to be a National Enguirer where most (except some gullible, ignorant people) know it is a bunch of hooey? Granted, the Enquirer HAS gotten it right sometimes, but one wonders if they just throw crap against the wall and hope some of it sticks.
That's the mantra of Columscum. Throw as much shit as you can in every direction and maybe some of it will stick. Columbus, as a rule, does not like "shit-stirrers." Ask Lynn Bigley or any other politician who has tried to go negative here and had there ass handed to them.
People read Columscum to see what the delusional asshole Bob has decided to go after. It is a source of entertainment for many, as in comical, but only taken seriously by a very, very few.
Bob didn't start that website. It was Mr. Inquisitive a.k.a. Columbusman.
Bob became a moderator, and eventually took over....I suppose because his life is so empty and sad, that he has the time to sit in front of his computer, and he loves to comment on EVERYTHING, as if his voice matters, or knows what others don't.
And now for something completely different:
They are having an essay contest over there.
I think they just want to pick up writing pointers from high school students.
COLUMBUZZ SAYS:
Before posting for our contest, please read our rules:
1. You must use a REAL e-mail when you send your article.
2. You must use a REAL first and last name. Only we will know your actual name unless you post a comment while you are logged into Columbuzz.net. Or unless you say something that opposes Bob's opinion. Then he will 'out' you.
3. Must be an active middle or high school student attending one of the schools in Columbus Indiana.
4. Only submit one essay, per student.
5. No profanity will be allowed. Any and all profanity will come from Bob Freeman
List of Entries: Entries will be posted as they come in until the final date. But we won't post it if we (Bob) doesn't like it.
Winner will be determined by visitors visiting Columbuzz.net.WRONG! Winner will be determined by Bob. It's an opportunity to use his God Power, and he will decide based on his own personal reasons.
Entries will be posted on Columbuzz.net allowing voters to read each article, then cast their vote. Voting will be by selection where only one email address can cast a vote. This will prevent rigging by multiple voting. The only rigging will be done by us (Bob Freeman).
Also, we all know that Bob thinks voters are "stupid", so I think this is some sort of trick.
Anyone else rolling their eyes at the fake debates on columbuzz. Ever since I wrote that I have three times the visitor participation, the bots at columbuzz have been submitting comments like crazy.
They're like toddlers. They can be manipulated with ease, and their responses are predictable.
There are many more times that I want to comment about them, than I actually do.
What stops me, sometimes, is realizing that they're just grown-up children.
Whaddya gonna do?
Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) & Mercman > I hereby confess to "playing with Bob" on Columscum. (No, not in that way.) It's fun to stroke his magnificent ego while preparing to pull the rug from under his monstrously fat ass! Bob will tear into me sooner or later, I am just waiting for the optimum moment!
INDIANA TAXWATCH on 14 January, 2011 03:32:38
I do not always agree with Bob, in fact we disagree more than we agree, but at least Bob has had the fortitude to put his name and his ideas out there for everyone to decide on.
INDIANA TAXWATCH on 15 January, 2011 03:55:08
CORRUPT GOVERNMENT? SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE ELSE WHO RAN IN THE LAST ELECTION.
Truth Seeker on 15 January, 2011 05:46:52
It seems like when you are in the middle of a contoversy already maybe you should be honest about stuff to do with the IRS but then they have to cover up the money they spent on stuff they shouldn't of bought with church money.
I for one will be going to the IRS first thing Tuesday because they will be closed Monday for Martin Luther King Day. I already have copies of my checks from my bank ready for them and what Milestone sent doesn't match up at all!!
It's a miracle! Jeremy finally changed F&Q to FAQ!
Hey Herman. I said it here so that makes it heresay. If I'd have said it there it would be theresay. If I'd have said it on columbuzz it would be a lie.
@Anonymous - very nice :)
The "authors" at Columbuzz are at it again. Once again stealing intellectual property by copy-and-pasting content (articles & images) from actual news organizations. This time from Fox News.
http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=5511
For about the 100th time Bob, Jeremy, Herman, et al, you are legally only allowed to use a sentence or two tops and then provide a link to the source of the actual article. You're also required to credit the article's source (not just list the website).
I thought I'd taught you this already since you deleted most of the original stolen articles (probably because you were reported to at least 10 actual news sites by me alone for stealing content), but it looks like you need another lesson.
On www.foxnews.com it clearly states "This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistrubted. ©2011 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved."
Now unless my reading comprehension skills have deteriorated to Bob's level or somehow I woke up in an alternate universe, Columbuzz is still not a Fox News affiliate and none of you work for Fox News, right?
Look forward to being contacted by yet another news organization's legal department. Oh and I almost forgot, Google doesn't appreciate its ads appearing on fraudulent sites (you should read the AdSense agreement, but trust me I'm right).
Found on Facebook..... Not on Fox News. FACEBOOK...
A few other places to get the same story..... Critics are saying we stole this story from Fox News. We never even saw it on FoxNews. Who reads their crap?
I googled it since the complaints and I found it on every website except Fox.
As we stated, we found it on Facebook. I wonder where Fox found it.
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/b/babysamuel.htm
http://www.snopes.com/photos/medical/thehand.asp
http://www.theroadtoemmaus.org/RdLb/21PbAr/LifHlth/Abrt/Newborn.htm
http://www.wickedfire.com/shooting-shit/111327-picture-year-perhaps-picture-decade.html
http://help.com/post/389073-picture-of-the-decade
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl-handofhope.htm
http://jamesjumpsuit.tumblr.com/post/2619419738/a-picture-began-circulating-in-november-it-should
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/samuel.html
The next story at the bottom of the article is from FOX. That is why it is a link.
And Columbuzz stands for truth. We would never affiliate with FOX...
And anonymous, play all you want but keep it clean. I'm helping Bob with some of the editing now. I love a good reason to delete trash.
You love to delete anything Joanna. I won't be back. Your people bore the hell out of me!
By the way Joanna, since you seem so keen on deleting trash, how about deleting yourself and Bob? That would be a really good start.
"And Columbuzz stands for truth."
Ha! Good one!
"And anonymous, play all you want but keep it clean"
Does Bob "keep it clean"?
@Joanna:
Still waiting for you to answer my questions about Bob. Shouldn't Bob be in jail too with this threats of violence? Or with his shenanigans with the odometer tampering device?
They had the idea for the fuse switch one day and thought it would work for an odometer the next. Bob told a friend about it the next day and the friend brought Bob legal info the next. All ads were cancelled that day. None were made, except the one prototype.
None were sold. The ad someone found was one that was overlooked until now. Nine years? Still no sales.
Bob made threats of violence? I don't think so.
Read it again. If he did, I'm sure he would be in jail.
@Joanna:
"They had the idea for the fuse switch one day and thought it would work for an odometer the next. Bob told a friend about it the next day and the friend brought Bob legal info the next. All ads were cancelled that day. None were made, except the one prototype"
WOW. SO HE TOLD YOU THIS AND YOU BELIEVE IT? IN 2 DAYS HE HATCHED AN ILLEGAL PLAN, MARKETED IT AND DROPPED IT? HE'S EITHER THE WORLD'S BIGGEST MORON OR LYING TO YOU, OR BOTH.
Joanna said "Bob made threats of violence? I don't think so. Read it again."
OK, LET'S READ IT AGAIN:
"I know where some of you live. You want to cross the line, then lets cross the fucking line. It would be worth some time in jail to destroy your homes. And the lives of some of your family."
"You keep saying on here that I'm nuts and a retard. Piss me off and find out. I could play the part in a HUGE way"
"You talk big when others that I do know will suffer. I will not tolerate it. Try me, asshole."
THOSE ARE JUST A FEW. YOU ENJOY BOB'S RHETORIC. TELL ME, SOUND LIKE BOB? I DON'T ENJOY HIS RHETORIC BUT I'VE READ ENOUGH OF IT TO KNOW THAT'S HIM. AND WHOSE LIVES IS HE THREATENING TO DESTROY? SOUNDS LIKE A THREAT TO ME. YOU KNOW WHAT HE'S DOING TO THE BARKES'. WHAT ABOUT THE FERRENBURGS? RODNEY GOT INTO A VERBAL ARGUMENT WITH BOB AND NEXT THING YOU KNOW BOB'S THREATENING TO POST NUDE PICTURES OF HIS WIFE. WHAT ABOUT JOHN TINKEY? YOUR COLUMBUZZ BUDDIES WON'T STOP TAKING POKES AT HIM.
IMAGINE IF HE LEARNED OTHER PEOPLE'S NAMES. I THINK YOU KNOW WHAT HE WOULD DO. AND YET YOU HAVE THE NERVE TO SAY BOB DOESN'T THREATEN PEOPLE.
"Bob made threats of violence? I don't think so."
Spoken like a true Bob-o-bot. By the way, you're allowed to think for yourself. You don't need Bob the cult leader to think for you.
"They had the idea for the fuse switch one day and thought it would work for an odometer the next. Bob told a friend about it the next day and the friend brought Bob legal info the next. All ads were cancelled that day. None were made, except the one prototype."
So he says. Bob broke the law by advertising and testing the device. It doesn't matter that he didn't sell any.
It's funny how when Bob gets "evidence" of an alleged crime and the accused explains what really happened, Bob and the bots believe the person is lying. But when ironclad evidence is shown of Bob breaking the law, you bots just dismiss it and believe everything he says. Do you actually believe that Bob never lies? If you do, then you need to use some of your ad money to buy a clue.
BOB HAS MADE AN ABUNDANCE OF THREATS THAT ONLY A BOB-LOVER WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SEE. GET OUT OF BOB'S BED JOANNA AND TAKE A GOOD HARD LOOK AT SOME OF THE THINGS HE HAS SAID!
Tell you what Joanna, since you like Bob's rhetoric so much and you don't think he threatens anyone, here's what I could do. What if I created a post on my blog all about you, Joanna Nichols (I'm assuming that's your last name), and wrote the following:
She is a cunt who should be knocked on her ass.
I know where you live. It would be worth some time in jail to destroy your home. And the lives of some of your family.
I own a few guns. Give me reason cunt. Back off.
You keep saying on here that I'm nuts. Piss me off and find out. I could play the part in a HUGE way.
You talk big when others that I do know will suffer.
So, Joanna, how would you feel about that?
It's BS on a blog. Nothing more. Write away.
Bob told you those weren't his words. Everyone is anonymous most of the time here. Anyone could have written those words. Most days, Bob doesn't even read this website. He read it a lot more than you think he did before he wrote and said he would not post here again.
Your buddies were writing things in his name. No matter what he did, he could never win. He thought writing under his name only would solve it but others kept writing under his name and anonymous looking like him. He gave up. He told me he is going to stop reading this site altogether. That is partially why I come in here. Just to see what you say about what we do.
But I think I will stop coming here as often.
Nothing works.
No matter what we say, you tear it apart. There is no reason with you people.
You are against Bob no matter what he does. No sense in furthering the debate.
That isn't Bob.
"Bob told you those weren't his words."
No, he wrote on columbuzz that they were his words. If he's now saying they aren't, then he's lying, AGAIN.
"Your buddies were writing things in his name."
Which comments are in his name and aren't his?
"No matter what we say, you tear it apart. There is no reason with you people. You are against Bob no matter what he does."
Because most of what Bob writes is hypocritical nonsense and knee jerk reactions. He contradicts himself constantly. And if what I write is wrong, then tell me why I'm wrong. I won't delete your comments like you know who. But you don't, because you cannot defend the indefensible.
By the way, since it looks like you believe everything Bob tells you, explain these statements from Bob:
From columbuzz:
"I broke no laws with the odometer deal."
From an email I received from BOB:
"An ex Franklin cop, one of our drivers, is the one that told me it was illegal and he brought me the same legal stuff posted at your site."
"Using it to shut off an odometer was illegal."
"I wonder what the statute of limitations is on something like this"
He knew that he broke the law, yet he blatantly lied about it on columbuzz. And that's not the only time he's lied on columbuzz. I look forward to your spin doctoring on this one.
"Your buddies were writing things in his name. No matter what he did, he could never win. He thought writing under his name only would solve it but others kept writing under his name and anonymous looking like him. He gave up. He told me he is going to stop reading this site altogether."
Don't you just love it when Bob attempts to play the victim.
No one here is writing anything to disparage Bob. WE DON'T HAVE TO JOANNA. He does it to himself. There HAS been discourse on here between BOB and those of us, who, admittedly HATE HIM. YES, JOANNA, I HATE THE FAT S-O-B! Having just said that, I don't have to put words in his mouth. We have proof of stuff he has said.
"An ex Franklin cop, one of our drivers, is the one that told me it was illegal and he brought me the same legal stuff posted at your site."
The ex cop was the friend and driver he and I mentioned.
"Using it to shut off an odometer was illegal."
As a fuse switch it wasn't illegal. Using it to tamper with an odometer was illegal. That was never done.
"I wonder what the statute of limitations is on something like this"
I think since you were so worried about it he wondered if he did break the law what the statute of limitations on the crime was. It had been nine or ten years.
Hate is a mighty powerful words about someone you never personally met. Bob is a sweet guy and wants only good. You twist things so badly hear you can never see the real Bob.
He ran for office to try to make things better. He runs columbuzz for the same reasons. We all do. We post injustices so people are aware and try to change those injustices.
Hate is a mighty powerful words about someone you never personally met.
HOW DO YOU KNOW I HAVE NEVER MET BOB? YES, HATE IS POWERFUL AND I RESERVE IT FOR PEOPLE LIKE HIM.
Bob is a sweet guy and wants only good.
YOU ARE AS DELUSIONAL AS HE IS. BOB IS AN EGOTISTICAL BASTARD.
You twist things so badly hear you can never see the real Bob.
OH REALLY? HOW MUCH OF BOB'S COMMENTARY ON HERE HAVE YOU READ?
He ran for office to try to make things better.
HE RAN FOR OFFICE BECAUSE HE IS A POWER-HUNGRY ASSHOLE.
He runs columbuzz for the same reasons.
HE RUNS COLUMBUZZ BECAUSE HE IS AN EGOTISTICAL BASTARD.
We all do.
BIRDS OF A FEATHER DEAR LADY!
We post injustices so people are aware and try to change those injustices.
WHAT INJUSTICES? HOW MANY ACTUAL, TRUE AND VERIFIED INJUSTICES HAVE YOU JERKS REALLY UNCOVERED THAT WERE NOT HEARSAY AND INNUENDO.
I am fascinated at just how ignorant Bob's supporters truly are. I don't know of another adjective to use. Anyone who thinks Bob Freeman offers anything to the discussion of real issues should have there head examined.
Bob is a psychopath without question. Being Bob's friend is like befriending a rattlesnake. Eventually, you WILL get bit. I just hope that my family and/or friends are nowhere near the SOB when he goes postal and trust me, it is just a matter of time.
O.K. Joanna, my tech savvy buddy and I are done with Columscum for awhile. Watch your dismal numbers head into the tank. ROFLMAO!
FYI the code we hacked your "VOTE FOR MAYOR" poll was so easily done. Every single vote for Greg Renner and Joe Richardson was our HACK!!!!!
HA HA HA HA HA
ROFLMAO! The Mayor's Poll is GONE! Stay tuned for another attack soon Bob. Won't say when. I think we'll wait till you get fat and comfortable again.
Maybe a nice DOS so that no one can log on. That's a nice idea.
COULD THE CULT CRAP BE A HACK????????? COULD ALL OF THIS BE MADE UP??????
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://tinypic.com/r/2djt8w6/7
Don't anyone be fooled, fat boy reads this just as much or more often than he does Columscum. We have proof!
The geniuses on Columbuzz respond to me pointing out that they are stealing content again:
"I googled it since the complaints and I found it on every website except Fox.
As we stated, we found it on Facebook. I wonder where Fox found it."
Um, the link that you list at the bottom of your stolen "article" is the Fox News article.
Also, where exactly did you "find it on Facebook"? I don't see any Facebook links?
Bob, you and your crew are all extremely sad.
YIKES, Bob and his crew are NOT tech savvy. They are illiterate dumb-asses. This is not just good old "hate Bob" talk, it is fact.
We over-wrote there code and script over the weekend and created over a hundred "false" votes on there mayoral campaign poll. They didn't find it until we told them!
We have placed other code in there scripts that will surface, unless they can find it, over the next few days.
They are magnificent idiots in every since of the word!
Another thing:
Did you actually take the photographs you copied to your server(s) and posted? No
Do you have the photographer's permission? No
Do you have the copyright owner's permission? No
Did you even bother to credit the photographers? No
Did you infringe on multiple copyrights again? Yes
Did you steal intellectual property again? Yes
Are you in violation of Google's ad policies? Yes
Is Columbuzz a total joke? Absolutely
BOB GET'S SPANKED AGAIN:
http://tinypic.com/r/10oinwl/7
Come on Bob, this is tooooooooooooooo easy!
"An ex Franklin cop, one of our drivers, is the one that told me it was illegal and he brought me the same legal stuff posted at your site."
This means that Bob read the law. The law clearly states that advertising and testing such a device is illegal. So now are you going to tell me that Bob can't read?
"As a fuse switch it wasn't illegal. Using it to tamper with an odometer was illegal. That was never done."
Bob said he tested it, so you are incorrect.
"I think since you were so worried about it he wondered if he did break the law what the statute of limitations on the crime was. It had been nine or ten years."
Bob KNEW he broke the law (note the all caps). You are just a Bob apologist. In your eyes, he can do no wrong. Pathetic.
"Bob is a sweet guy and wants only good."
Yeah, he's a real sweetheart, especially when he says someone should be "knocked on their ass" and when he calls women cunts.
"You twist things so badly hear you can never see the real Bob."
I see the real Bob, and he's scary. Tell me how I'm twisting things so badly.
"He ran for office to try to make things better. He runs columbuzz for the same reasons."
No, he does it to feed his massive ego. And the people have clearly spoken. They don't want Bob in public office. He would not make things better. He would be a total disaster.
"We post injustices so people are aware and try to change those injustices."
Every once in a while you do, but you also post a lot of damaging rumors about people that may or may not be true. But I'm guessing you don't care about that since the rumors aren't about you.
Somebody made a point along the lines that if Bob says he didn't threaten people, then he didn't. Why do you trust what he says.
Even if his unbelievable story/timeline about the odometer tamper devices is true, remeber this. He wanted to manufacture and sell devices whose sole purpose is to steal. There is no other reason to change your odometer. You alter your odometer to fool people into thinking the automobile you are selling is worth more than it is. This is lying. This is theft. Colbuzz likes to quote (and misquote) law to justify their actions. So let me break this down to it's bare minimum (and legally correct) definition:
lie + theft = fraud
So Bob has admitted to wanting to make a profit helping others commit fraud. How exactly is he believable?
FYI -
In this context “news” and “public affairs” are an exceptionally broad term that means almost anything of public interest. Basically, if there’s a story which discusses nearly any issue of public interest, no matter how small, it is exempt from the right of publicity.
To the photoshop person, our site doesn't use "HTML" code in the context you know it. If you view the source it appears to be standard "HTML" but of course you knew that.
"Um, the link that you list at the bottom of your stolen "article" is the Fox News article."
It was a follow up article to the first article from 1999.
"Also, where exactly did you "find it on Facebook"? I don't see any Facebook links?"
It was posted on somebody's wall. It had no indication it was an article. It was posted as a story with a picture. Where 'exactly' is none of your business. It was a ten year old story.
If it's new to Fox they should update a bit.
I don't think right of publicity means what you think it means. Take 2 aspirin and a lawyer in the morning.
Call a lawyer in the morning
"Even if his unbelievable story/timeline about the odometer tamper devices is true, remember this. He wanted to manufacture and sell devices whose sole purpose is to steal."
Excellent point. And it also shows his hypocrisy, since he rants about the alleged "shenanigans" of others, but ignores his own.
It's not photo-shopping when one hacks your HTML code, Columscum. You were hacked. Get on it or get over it!
You didn't hack us 'tinypic' LOL
You found a way to run poll numbers up but you didn't hack us. If you had you would have damaged the system. You're all talk.
Game on RETARD!
I would strongly advise anyone against hacking websites, even columbuzz. It is against the law and it's almost as bad as tampering with odometers.
Touche' Dude.
censored on 17 January, 2011 06:10:17
What kind of priorities does this person have? If you can pay for internet you shouldn't be taking bread from Love Chapel.
A-men! And if you don't understand "script" and "code" you shouldn't act like you do Herman. As of right now, I am going to leave Columbuzz alone because, as Dude suggests, it makes me as bad as Bob.
It just makes me mad when idiots deny what they know is FACT but that happens at Columbuzz all the time.
Happy "writing" Herman!
"He's a liar."
Or maybe he's just trying to mess with you. But we all know that Bob is a liar, or are you blind to that fact Herman.
I've never seen Bob lie. What makes you think he lies?
Have you read my blog? I have provided multiple examples.
Columscum idiots sure seem to know a lot about smoking dope.
They are all as blind and delusional as Bob. That orgy they call Columscum is a bastion of liars and idiots. They post innuendo and hearsay as FACT and then wait, hope and pray that some other delusional ass will prove it for them.
They don't know reality from fantasy which is there biggest problem, well, that and the 400 pound elephant in the room also known as Bob Freeman.
Those people are the disenfranchised, outcasts of Columbus who don't fit in anywhere. They are white trash, ignorant, hicks from the sticks. Right, Hermann?
I've seen nothing Bob has said that you have proven to be a lie. You repeatedly call him a liar but have not proven one lie. Not one.
Of course you haven't "seen one" Herman. Like most of the people at Columscum, you wouldn't know a lie when it smacks you in the face, which it does, repeatedly.
Then show one lie since they are so plentiful.
One of many:
"But they (Fred and Rodney) deny everything and won't explain anything."
When Bob wrote this, he knew the explanations were on my blog. Lie.
Another:
"Of course, if my opponent loses the election, most of his family and friends are afraid they will lose their jobs and become clients of the Trustees office."
Lie. Heard from Fred Barkes directly that this was not true.
And another:
"I broke no laws with the odometer deal."
Bob has read the law. He knows what it says. Testing and advertising is against the law. Lie.
Bob has lied about calling women "cunts" and "whores." Bob has said he would NEVER call women those names yet he has again and again.
Another:
"Everyone will post civally or their posts will be deleted. Disagreeing with what is said here is fine. Attacking people for what they post here is not."
Bob attacks posters all the time. Lie.
Another:
"We don't track IP addresses."
Lie.
Hey Herman, you have an HTML script issue:
http://bcwatchman.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2010-02-20T15%3A24%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=7... | | Read 71 Times | Full story
Oh wait, you don't use HTML! ROFLMAO! IDIOT!
Another:
"We protect the privacy of those who post here."
Lie. Didn't protect my privacy.
They are the IP tracking experts but it may not be a lie dude. Perhaps in there delusional "meth induced" state of mind, they don't realize they are tracking IP's just like they don't realize there page is written in HTML.
"We protect the privacy of those who post here."
THEY DON'T KNOW WHO POSTS THERE!
I can plainly see that Bob 'The Liar' Freeman, is still posting comments here.
Does he really think he is being unnoticed?
We know it's you, Bob.
Keeping your hard-drive clean and innocent?
You are being watched, big fella.
Another:
"Someone hacked the site and shut it down."
Lie. Columbuzz was not hacked.
Another:
"And I will not leave Barkes alone. He is a crook"
Lie. Bob has no proof that Fred Barkes is a crook.
Another:
"It's 2 or 3 people that post under anonymous or other phony names to make it look like they have several coming there."
Bob had no idea at the time how many people were visiting my site. Lie.
"But they (Fred and Rodney) deny everything and won't explain anything."
Absolutely true. Denials without any explanations.
"Of course, if my opponent loses the election, most of his family and friends are afraid they will lose their jobs and become clients of the Trustees office."
An exaggerated opinion, but not a lie. Very close to being accurate.
"I broke no laws with the odometer deal."
He never sold one and he stopped the ads when he learned it is illegal to mess with odometers.
Bob has lied about calling women "cunts" and "whores." Bob has said he would NEVER call women those names yet he has again and again.
He never called Briana a whore. He proved that. And Sandra Barkes was a cunt the day she went to the funeral home. That was an accurate description.
"Everyone will post civally or their posts will be deleted. Disagreeing with what is said here is fine. Attacking people for what they post here is not."
Having two sets of rules isn't a lie. That was written for those who visit to post, not to him. Disagreement isn't being uncivil.
"We protect the privacy of those who post here."
We have revealed nobody's identity.
"We don't track IP addresses."
We don't track IP addresses. We might look closely at few of those who cause trouble but we don't track any IP addresses.
Still no lies. You might not like what he writes but you have not proven anything he said to be a lie.
"Absolutely true. Denials without any explanations."
Lie. There are explanation on my site. If you can't read, that's not my fault.
"And I will not leave Barkes alone. He is a crook"
Could not be any truer.
"It's 2 or 3 people that post under anonymous or other phony names to make it look like they have several coming there."
That was his opinion. He may have been wrong, but it was not a lie.
"Someone hacked the site and shut it down."
That's what he thought at the time. Again, he was wrong, but not a lie.
It's funny, when Bob is caught in a lie, the bots claim it was just an exaggerated opinion or an "honest" mistake, but everyone else lies.
"And I will not leave Barkes alone. He is a crook"
This is libel without proof, Joanna.
"Lie. There are explanation on my site. If you can't read, that's not my fault."
No explanations, just denials. Everything Bob has said is true at the time he said it. He may have been wrong but he didn't lie about it.
And this is Joanna, not Bob.
You think you know it all, so it must be true. You're wrong again.
"I broke no laws with the odometer deal."
"He never sold one and he stopped the ads when he learned it is illegal to mess with odometers."
Joanna, you are telling me that Bob had no idea it was illegal to mess with odometers? Wow. But in this case, it really doesn't matter that Bob is an idiot. When Bob wrote "I broke no laws with the odometer deal.", he had already read the law, the law says testing and advertising was against the law, yet he still wrote that he broke no laws. LIE!
"We proved that Fred Barkes broke the law several times. He is a filthy crook."
Lie. Have you contacted the authorities and presented your "proof"?
"He illegally used funds from one account to pay for things in another. Proven fact."
He did nothing illegal. If he had, the SBOA would have busted him at the audit. Epic fail. Try again.
"Again, he was wrong"
Joanna, have you noticed that Bob is wrong most of the time?
Jimmer Jones on 17 January, 2011 05:44:47
They want to do away with trustees. We can't let that happen. They are too valuable to our communities.
Set stricter guidelines on them so they are more effecient.
Get rid of the bad ones like Fred Barkes and the dingdong in Clay Township and get good people in there.
JIMMER JONES IS BOB FREEMAN!
Joanna, how about you providing exaggerated opinions from Bob that were actually correct?
Joanna, where to begin?
"Of course, if my opponent loses the election, most of his family and friends are afraid they will lose their jobs and become clients of the Trustees office."
"An exaggerated opinion, but not a lie. Very close to being accurate."
Since when is Bob a physic? He doesn't know what people are thinking. He can suspect, be he can't know unless they tell him (and are honest) and he can't prove it.
"Bob has lied about calling women "cunts" and "whores." Bob has said he would NEVER call women those names yet he has again and again."
"He never called Briana a whore. He proved that. And Sandra Barkes was a cunt the day she went to the funeral home. That was an accurate description."
Well, regardless of whether you or he believes she is, he DID call Sandy that and the fact that he said he didn't and would never is a lie.]
"Everyone will post civally or their posts will be deleted. Disagreeing with what is said here is fine. Attacking people for what they post here is not."
"Having two sets of rules isn't a lie. That was written for those who visit to post, not to him. Disagreement isn't being uncivil."
So, do as I say not as I do? How well does that work with parents and kids?
"We protect the privacy of those who post here."
"We have revealed nobody's identity."
He has revealed where people work (he believes) and Charlie Townsend's (whether true or not). So, it stands to reason he hasn't because he can't, not because he protects their privacy. From what I have seen, he would reveal them in a minute if he even suspected and was upset with them.
"We don't track IP addresses."
"We don't track IP addresses. We might look closely at few of those who cause trouble but we don't track any IP addresses."
If you check out any (more than comparing from within the site) you are tracking them. Whether or not you track just ones who are "causing trouble" and that is it, you DO track IP addresses. Maybe not all, but at least some which makes that statement a lie.
"Still no lies. You might not like what he writes but you have not proven anything he said to be a lie."
Whether proven or not, saying something that is untrue is a lie.
"It's 2 or 3 people that post under anonymous or other phony names to make it look like they have several coming there."
"That was his opinion. He may have been wrong, but it was not a lie."
He never said it was an opinion. He stated it as fact. If it is not true, he lied.
"Someone hacked the site and shut it down."
"That's what he thought at the time. Again, he was wrong, but not a lie."
If someone says a falsehood, they have lied whether they did it knowingly and meant to or not.
Care to respond?
'"Everyone will post civally or their posts will be deleted. Disagreeing with what is said here is fine. Attacking people for what they post here is not."'
"Having two sets of rules isn't a lie. That was written for those who visit to post, not to him. Disagreement isn't being uncivil."
Bob wrote "Everyone", not "Everyone except the great and all powerful Bob Freeman".
'"We protect the privacy of those who post here."'
"We have revealed nobody's identity."
Lie. You revealed mine after I posted an article.
"We don't track IP addresses. We might look closely at few of those who cause trouble but we don't track any IP addresses."
Lie. Herman tracked one to Cummins and posted the IP address on columbuzz.
My last comment is hopefully in your spam folder.
"Bob wrote "Everyone", not "Everyone except the great and all powerful Bob Freeman"."
Nice catch. Besides, what is "civally"?
Columscum IS Bob Freeman. Herman and Joanna and Jeremy ARE Bob Freeman. If not in reality, then in theory. I challenge anyone of those idiots to take Bob to task and see how long they last.
Question Bob, challenge his complete and total authority and see how long you are allowed to remain in the orgy.
"Nice catch. Besides, what is "civally"?"
I preserved Bob's misspelling. :-)
Yeah, Dude, I knew yours was a direct quote. I was directing that comment at Bob via Joanna (or are they one and the same?) I say that because certain phrases and responses lately really remind me of his. But then again, there is that belief it is a cult so they may be all of one mind. Ooh, what I could do with that. :D
Is Freeman also Columbus Man?
Post a Comment