http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=5641
Bob wrote on columbuzz:
"Someone doesn't like what I write about them. They say it's lies, and I know what I write is true."
Most of it is lies, Bob. I see you're still delusional.
"I couldn't care less. I know it won't shut me up."
I don't think anything could shut you up, Bob, not even bankruptcy or jail.
"And as far as the Bob-o-bots, I know Phil Swain stopped posting here and asked me not to post anything from his e-mails anymore. So what? He switches alliances about as often as I would imagine you change underwear. Phil wants to go where he can have people who like him. If he has something I want to post on Columbuzz, I will simply post a link to it. But he doesn't usually have anything to say that is that important to post."
Ha! Now even Bob refers to his minions as Bob-o-bots! Gee Bob, you sure posted a lot of Phil's stuff before he asked you to stop. Now all of a sudden you think his stuff is unimportant? What changed?
"That's his choice. He will be at the other website until those nitwits turn on him again."
No Bob, I believe you're the one who turns on people. Chris Rutan? Phil Swaim? I'm sure there are many others.
12 comments:
Bob did turn on Phil awfully quick.
"Bob did turn on Phil awfully quick."
No kidding. He did it at ludicrous speed.
Bob's Selective Editing.
http://1dl.us/f6X.jpg
Bob wrote:
"And Hank, keep your nasty remarks out of your posts if you wish them posted in full."
I didn't see anything nasty. Accusing Bob of grandstanding and having a belligerent attitude is nasty? Like I said, Bob is a weasel.
haha, actually, he cannot post the link. my email to him specifically pointed out that he cannot even post links. He still is subscribed to my service, that's fine, but he cannot use any of my material or links to my material for use on his site.
I don't remember changing alliances. I think Bob is crazy enough to think he and I were real good buddies. wow. My alliances lie with people who are for the truth and are not defamatory when they deliver it. That also means my alliance is not necessarily with this blog either. I believe there is very good analysis in here, coupled with commentors' own personal attacks, which I overlook because it is not in the post.
But I never "turned" on anyone. If bob freeman wants to still talk politics with me, he's free to do that. But when we talk about putting things on print and broadcasting that, I cannot afford to have my content on a site that is potentially libelous and under a possible future investigation.
"It's nothing personal. It's just good business" -Lord Cutler Beckett, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
oh, and he said I change alliances as often as you might change your underwear.
Ha. Then people must change their underwear like what, once every few years? Wow. I believe Bob just insulted his own audience by calling them dirty. Good job.
handsome hank. Wow. That's editing. I moderate my comments, but 1, if I post them, I don't edit them 2. if they dont contain profanity, libel, or personal attacks, I post them. I might edit the profanity by putting stars in place of the word if they have an argument to make that is relevant.
But wow. Yeah. Bob is trying to control messages. His place is definitely not a place to make comment if you are wanting to question his methods. Hence why this blog is around. ha.
oh, and I must address another blunder in Bob's remarks. I was never a Bob-o-bot. Bob-o-bots agree wtih Bob 100 percent of the time and just nod their head to everything.
If I were ever a bob-o-bot you would have seen me reposting everything he posted. Obviously I have standards. Always have had standards. If bob thought I was one of his worshipers, then that's just crazy narcissism.
"I don't remember changing alliances. I think Bob is crazy enough to think he and I were real good buddies. wow."
Yes, I believe he did think that you approved of his methods.
"My alliances lie with people who are for the truth and are not defamatory when they deliver it. That also means my alliance is not necessarily with this blog either. I believe there is very good analysis in here, coupled with commentors' own personal attacks, which I overlook because it is not in the post."
I try to refrain from personal attacks as much as possible and I don't ask for anyone's alliance. I just want people to understand what columbuzz and Bob are all about, and it's not the truth, in my opinion.
"If bob thought I was one of his worshipers, then that's just crazy narcissism."
That pretty much describes Bob, crazy narcissism.
"Wow. I believe Bob just insulted his own audience by calling them dirty. Good job."
Bob is an expert at insulting people. He has insulted the voters numerous times.
My attempts to get Bob to understand the insanity of his rants should never be mistaken for an alliance. It was a good natured effort to help someone who is an egomaniac and delusional.
The thing that I DO like about Phil Swaim is that he seems to be void of alliances, per se. We have agreed to not be disagreeable and I think that is admirable. Our politics are likely different yet I would imagine our pursuit for the truth is similar. That aside for a moment...let's look at Bob.
Bob lacks the cognitive ability to discern between fact and what he "thinks" is fact. 99% of Bob's un-substantiated claims would never hold up in a court of law and are NOT worthy of a criminal investigation. For Bob to be right and everyone else to be wrong, then the SBOA, Indiana State Police, Columbus Police, Bartholomew County Sheriff and the Prosecuting Attorney are all in the conspiracy to deprive Bob of the pursuit of law enforcement and prosecution (IN THEORY!)
Bob's attacks go much further than the Barkes' and/or the Ferrenburg's, Bob Freeman is an assault on the people of Columbus and Bartholomew County and he is an insult to our collective intelligence.
Post a Comment