Friday, February 18, 2011

Bob Freeman: Is he a Felon, Incompetent, or does he just think we're Stupid?

Bob Freeman wrote on columbuzz:
"He hasn't passed a SBOA audit without issues since he has been in office."

Bob, you really need to stop lying.

"Fred Barkes is either too stupid to follow those rules or he thinks he doesn't need to follow those rules."

Writes the man who is either too stupid to follow federal odometer tampering laws or thinks he's exempt from those laws.

"It's time that we file formal complaints with the state and maybe even with the local prosecutor. Enough is enough!"

Yes Bob, I agree.  You should turn yourself in immediately.

"Yes, I lost the election. This has nothing to do with the election."

In my opinion, yet another lie from Bob.

Phil Swaim wrote on columbuzz:
"The fact Bob is not giving up on reporting these issues shows that he really does not care about the election, just about doing the right thing, at least I hope."

Yeah, right.  Bob doing the right thing?  Now that would be a miracle.  Phil, get a grip.

Lucy wrote on columbuzz:
"If this was your area, wouldn't you want the truths uncoverd???. ...I think there's lots to be uncovered....you worried about something being discovered???"

Spoken like a true Bobobot. Bob never lies, blah, blah, blah.

22 comments:

Dude said...

Visitor update: up to 277 unique visitors, 92 times Bob's estimate.

Anonymous said...

Everything Bob says is an estimate....

And they're ALL off by about 92 times!

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately Bob does not know how to stop lying. His lies have been pointed out numerous times but he just doesn’t get it. No one believes a liar. Besides that, anyone that wanted to look at the SBOA can and see the truth. Dude even posted the links and they are clean. One issue where the auditor listed that the funds should have been under a different category does not mean someone is a crook. Now….trying to sell illegal devices would mean they are a crook. After all the lies we have caught, it causes me to wonder at the things that have not been caught yet. Usually the people who are the dirtiest try to make others appear that way so they are not looked at as closely. Let’s not forget the Bob o bot who threatened he is carrying guns in case anyone talks to Bob in public. All Bob can focus on is a few things that he has been trying to prove for over a year. How about all of the things against him that have been proven?
E

Danny Plamer said...

John Dough on 17 February, 2011 09:15:56
Keep it up Bob. We need to know what is really going on.

SOUNDS LIKE BOB MAKING POST UNDER OTHER NAMES AGAIN LOL , NEVER SEEN THIS NAME ON COLUMBUTT LIAR SITE BEFORE.
PAT YOUR SELF ON THE BACK THERE KING LIAR, NOBODY ELES WILL LOSER

Anonymous said...

Phil Swaim? Smart? ROFLMFAOAHMS

Anonymous said...

AHMS = AND HOLDING MY SIDES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Lucy (not her real name) said this on Columbuzzed -
"Phil, elaborating on your thought of ppl leaving, on the other hand, we want to make Columbus as appealing as we can. Many who come here are met with QUTIE a surprise, when they find out, THAQT our fair city INSN'T as green as what they like!!! In many places, recycling is second nature, these ppl don't want to go back in time....they want a CICY(?) up on the current trends.
Some may even have higher standards THAT WHAT WE OFF, and that;s not good either to lose ppl cause we're behind the times...I think many will see HO far behind we are, and 'those' are the ppl that won't even give Columbus a chance...."



LMAO!

What a dizzy mixed-up dingbat!
And she was chosen to introduce the President, O-Bomb-A, when he came to town? (Columbus, not Edinburgh)

Hi, my name is Lucy and I live in Peanuts World.

LOLOLOLOL

Anonymous said...

Phil might like griping and looking for wrongs, but at least he has some skills in logical thinking. Even so, there is nothing wrong with trying to keep the politicians honest.

Danny Palmer said...

keeping the politicians honest.

yes thats very true,

but in BOBS case he cant be honest about anything or with himself or anybody.
Bob couldnt tell the truth if he read it off a paper.
as for loosey who even cares

Anonymous said...

Bob is a different case altogether and I wasn't referring to his keeping them honest. Bob sees fires everywhere except himself and his Democratic buddies.

Human Diagnostics said...

"Bob Freeman: Is he a Felon, Incompetent, or does he just think we're Stupid?"

Bob has a mental illness.
I believe he is schizophrenic.

Look up the symptoms for schizophrenia, and you may be amazed at the resemblance to the character of Bob Freeman.

One classic and predominant symptom of this illness is delusional behavior.
Take a look at this and see if it isn't Bob Freeman all over.
DELUSION-BOB FREEMAN

Anonymous said...

Re: Dude, Mercman, Charlie, Jeff Barkes...

1. Fregoli Delusion
2. Intermetamorphosis

Bob is a Zip said...

Wonder where Ole Lard Barn Bob's Report is from his trip to the Auditor's Office to obtain evidence against The Evil Fred Barkes?

Anonymous said...

Maybe his dog ate his homework.

Anonymous said...

Bob thinks he is always right even when he hasn't a clue. Fred is trying to do a good job but we all make mistakes. Bob keeps harping on the fire department maintenance building that is also wired to set up the township office within 24 hours. The Columbus Township fire department is first on call for mutual aid with the City of Columbus and have assisted on all major fires within the City limits.

Bob is a nut-case that wouldn’t know a real truth even when the facts are pointed out to him. I tried to tell him the truth before the election but Bob has such a hard-on for Fred that he just doesn’t want to here or admit it. Now he is still at it and won’t stop. He needs help very badly but we all know that isn’t going to happen.

Anonymous said...

Have you ever notice that when BOB makes a big rant about Fred or trusties office.
he falls of face of the earth for about a week.
doesnt say anything after he makes a FOOL of himself AGAIN.

Anonymous said...

Bob is a nut-case

Now thats FUNNY! (True but I like seeing it!!!!)

Phil Swaim said...

To be fair, there is a ton of libel in here, but that is beside my point I wish to make.

I was not congratulating Bob Freeman, at least not fully. What I did was support someone who does not care how an election turned out.

Now, I do not agree with many of the tactics, nor do I believe some of the things Bob had on his site during the campaign, and I certainly did not appreciate the off issue remarks about wives going to funerals and calling people whores.

That's just uncalled for. his SBOA arguments, though, were right on the money. he should have just stuck to those issues. I hope he continues with that mindset of sticking to the issues and bringing evidence to the table.

I do not appreciate backless claims.

Dude said...

"To be fair, there is a ton of libel in here"

Do tell. I've called Bob a liar and backed up my claims.

"What I did was support someone who does not care how an election turned out."

Do you really believe this?

Phil Swaim said...

Phil Swaim + Bob Freeman = LOSERS! from Brian (a constant offender on bob's site and I suspect mine too.)

I would expect such nonsense out of Retard Bob and Airhead Fat Lucy but I thought Phil Swaim was much smarter than to associate himself with these idiots. from Retard Watcher

What a dizzy mixed-up dingbat! from Anonymous.

Those are the examples of libel in this thread or slander.

I don't really know what is going on in Bob's head (I might not want to know, honestly). I have to, though, take him at his word when he says that his continuing coverage of Fred has nothing to do with the election results.

If that is true, I must say that is great, so long as he doesn't commit libel like he did during the election. So long as he keeps to the SBOA and actual issues, then I am interested in his findings, but if he just wants to talk about how stupid someone is or give hearsay on funerals and wives being whores, then I really have no appetite for that.

Dude said...

Phil, seriously, if name calling was considered libel, then just about everyone could be sued for libel.

Phil Swaim said...

again, as i stated in another post,

I was mixing personal attacks with libel. I honestly see them as equally poor in taste because nothing gets accomplished and it's just hate.


I stand corrected. Thanks dude.