In a comment on his latest attack on Fred Barkes, Bob says:
"I find it ironic that drug use is one factor that can get you denied help from the Trustee... Do as we say and not as we do? They won't help others with drug problems but they will allow their son with the problem to live in their home."
I'm sorry Bob, but his makes no sense. If Fred Barkes' son had received assistance from the trustee while using drugs, then you would have an argument. And Bob ignores the fact that there's a very good reason why drug users are denied help. Most taxpayers don’t like the idea of supporting someone’s drug habit by paying their rent so they can use money that would normally go towards rent to be used to buy drugs. Are you really helping them or just enabling their addiction? It is unfortunate that it has to be this way, but the trustee must make difficult decisions at times.
Now let's suppose that the trustee changes this policy and allows drug users to receive assistance. Bob would be the first to write an article titled "Trustee Allows Drug Users to Use Taxpayer Money to Buy Drugs". No matter what he does, the trustee can't please everyone. If he allows drug users to receive assistance, then the taxpayers are upset for using tax money to buy drugs. If he does not allow them to receive assistance, then the drug users are upset. I think Bob is showing his naivete on this issue.
9 comments:
I said it was IRONIC that they turn drug users away and he had drugs and a drug user at his house.
No Bob, it is NOT ironic. Fail. Try again.
Let's talk about Bob's admitted illegal activity (Bob may not be smart enough to know he is breaking Indiana Laws) Criminal Trespassing on private property, he does it all the time on when he is doing his investigations for his website and also by placing campaign signs in public right of ways those are just the obvious ones. I'm sure there is more if you want to dig.
Hey Anonymous, you should write an article on columbuzz and blow the whistle on Bob. I'm sure it would be approved by the dictators/moderators.
I hope he can get the fish in the river to vote
BOB remember they have to be registered and have a valid photo ID or that is voter fraud.
Bob thought someone one said mud sucker not mud slinger
It isn't trespassing when you have permission.
And the river bank is public property.
The signs will be removed the day after I win the election.
Dig away. If I am breaking a law, have me prosecuted.
Working on it
But if you read the state laws you are not to place signs on Public Property. You idiot
(Gee Bob if it was legal all the politicians would have signs in the right of ways)
Seeing how you will not win I guess we will have to see your signs tell it floods again. Thanks
I know you have been on private property without permission.
Bob, just remember when it floods and they are washed away, that will be Littering. That is another one of those State Laws.
Anonymous, make sure you are clear with Bob there is only Bob's law is his world.
Post a Comment