Jeremy Kirtz, one of the administrators on Columbuzz.net, wrote the following in a comment on my blog: "I believe there is a difference to what Bob is stating to what is "possibly" occurring with an elected official whom should be held accountable to the community’s magnifying glass, whereas Bob is an individual who will be (if elected) under this same scrutiny"
OK, then let's turn the tables. Here's a hypothetical situation. Let's suppose that Bob Freeman wins the election and after a few months, someone finds out about some "shenanigans" going on with the trustee budget. So Jeremy, in this situation, will this person be allowed to post an article on columbuzz to blow the whistle on Bob? Will Bob really be held under the same scrutiny by your so called whistle blowing website? I doubt it.
2 comments:
They will be allowed IF it's true.
Ha! You're hilarious Bob! And who gets to decide if it's true. YOU! Sounds like a conflict of interest to me.
Post a Comment