Bob the Cult Leader

"Understandably, the articles related to the Milestone Ministries have raised tempers and caused people to go to extremes."

Including you and Lucy, Bob.

"During this conversation, someone mentioned the ministers daughter had received abortions. It was posted as true, but it is the first mention of it, and it's relevancy really wasn't clear."

The relevancy is entirely clear for those of us with functioning brains, which would exclude the Bob-o-bots.

"Lucy was the clearest, in my opinion, about the relevancy of the possibility by noting that a preacher that preaches against pre-marital sex, as most do, shouldn't have a daughter that had several abortions. The fact that she did or didn't have the abortions became unimportant when that debate arose."

Again, for those of us with active brain cells, it is totally irrelevant.

"A minister condemning others and revealing their faults because he is upset with them is not only unconscienable, but his right to do so is eliminated if and when he has issues like that of his own."

If it is true, he does not have issues like that of his own. His daughter does.

"Anyway, the accusation was made by one of our posters. Right or wrong, I deleted it because of the unfairness of such an unproven statement."

Did you track his IP too like you do the posters you don't like? And why haven't you deleted any of your unproven statements in the past?

"Then along comes 'Tiana.' She pretends to be a friend of the accused and says that 'she' KNOWS it isn't true. So all hell breaks loose in Columbuzzopolis. The one that made the claim was instantly doubted and the issue turns to credibility of statements made here. We have allowed everyone, including the Milestone clan, to post their views on the makings of a church or cult."

For the most part, statements made on columbuzz have zero credibility, especially yours.

"Last night, 'Private' made a post. His IP address looked familiar,so I looked around, and saw that 'm' had made a post from the same IP address. That's possible, I suppose, if people are sharing their computer or their network, like in a CHURCH, for instance. So I mentioned in my reply that they were 'm' or 'Private.' This morning, 'Private' basically called me a liar."

That's because you are a proven liar.

"I can't say this is the same person making all of the posts, but I can say they come from the same IP address. THAT, in my opinion, throws out all credibility of this poster. I believe it is one individual making all of these posts. I believe they are just here to stir. They wanted to bring doubt to what another poster said, and they succeeded. They want to sit and cause trouble for an otherwise civil debate. This is the sort of crap I get from the idiots at the whistledick website."

You also believe the moon landings were faked, so what you believe is not credible. And I still don't understand Bob's definition of civil. He should explain his definition, but he probably just makes it up on the fly, just like a cult leader would do. If he does explain it, he should make sure to admit his hypocrisy and let everyone know that he's exempt from being civil. Do as I say, not as I do.