Thursday, December 16, 2010

My Response to Bob's Comment

"Nope, no cease and desist orders. No complaints. We simply got tired of people like those at the other site complaining about it and there is no question of legality if we aren't doing it."

Do you know why no cease and desist orders? Because your site does not generate enough traffic for them to care.

"John Clark simply explained what he felt we were allowed to do after I borrowed a couple of articles of local interest for discussion. And that was weeks ago..
The goal of borrowing the stories is to make this site more interesting in between the local stuff that comes by every now and then."


Borrowing? Good one!

"Posting the link to their story does the same thing and it eliminates the legality debate."

You just now figured that out? Better late than never, I guess.

"And my potty mouth? I have always had it, not usually as bad as I used at your site, but I have always used a little color in my language."

Personally, I'm more concerned about your threats than I am your potty mouth.

"So, no real changes, except we are trying to make this website appeal to as many people as possible."

Why do you care about appealing to as many people as possible all of a sudden?

"And Dude, all of your posts will be allowed here if they are civil and on subject, unless it is obvious you are just trying to stir."

And I hope you hold yourself to the same standard. Please read and follow your own usage policy.

"I didn't ban you, I don't do that, someone else did. Why you are unbanned is beyond me. Banning doesn't matter to me. If your post sucks, I simply delete it."

And who will delete your posts when they suck? I recommend adding Lucy, one of your more intelligent commenters, as a moderator since you, Jeremy, and Herman act like one moderator.

"Civil debate is what we want. So if your posts were deleted, they weren't civil or they were simply written to stir or cut someone down."

But your uncivil posts were not deleted.

"I don't need to ban you."

You can't ban anyone. It's easy to get around.

"Actually, Charlene seems to have the happy trigger on the ban button."

Then I would like to ask Charlene why you weren't banned a long time ago?

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

That was the fastest end to a Christmas Miracle I have ever seen. Once an ass, always an ass. Bob will NEVER change. He is just a class A jerk!

Anonymous said...

Ban away dumb-ass, ban away! We will get through your trashy efforts to block us. It's actually easy!

BOB FREEMAN said...

I thought Bob was done with us. What happened?

FREEMAN FOR SCHOOL BOARD said...

MY TAKE ON BOB'S LATEST EXPLANATION:

Bob Freeman on 16 December, 2010 04:11:37

Some people on another site think we got served papers to stop.

WHY DO YOU CARE WHAT WE THINK?

Nope, no cease and desist orders. No complaints. We simply got tired of people like those at the other site complaining about it and there is no question of legality if we aren't doing it.

AGAIN, WHY DO YOU CARE BOB? YOU SAID YOU WERE DONE WITH US. GUESS IT'S HARD TO IGNORE THE TRUTH!

And The Republic didn't send their lawyers after us. John Clark simply explained what he felt we were allowed to do after I borrowed a couple of articles of local interest for discussion. And that was weeks ago..

BOB NAME DROPPING. I LOVE IT!

Legal or illegal, it isn't our goal to piss them off. Jeremy isn't fond of The Republic but I am. I know John from the old Sound Off days. He has always been fair with me and I try to be fair with him.

AWE. I FEEL ALL WARM A FUZZY THAT BOB "THINKS" HE HAS A FRIEND AT THE REPUBLIC. HEY BOB, ASK JOHN ABOUT THEM ALL ROLLING ON THE FLOOR LAUGHING THERE ASSES OFF AT YOUR POSTS ON COLUMBUZZ AND YOUR ONIONS. YOU HAVE BEEN GOOD FOR QUITE A FEW LAUGHS IN THE EDITORIAL MEETINGS!

The goal of borrowing the stories is to make this site more interesting in between the local stuff that comes by every now and then.

COLUMSCUM IS QUITE ENTERTAINING AS IT IS, FOR THE COMEDY.

And my potty mouth? I have always had it, not usually as bad as I used at your site, but I have always used a little color in my language.

WHAT YOU HAD HERE WAS A MENTAL MELT-DOWN AND IS STILL POSTED FOR EVERYONE TO SEE.

So, no real changes, except we are trying to make this website appeal to as many people as possible.

THOSE ARE HUGE CHANGES DUMB-ASS. WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO FOOL?

And Dude, all of your posts will be allowed here if they are civil and on subject, unless it is obvious you are just trying to stir.

ROFLMAO! APPROVAL BY BOB! PRICELESS!

Debating is one thing, causing trouble is quite another.

YOU KNOW A LOT ABOUT CAUSING TROUBLE FAT BOY!

I didn't ban you, I don't do that, someone else did. Why you are unbanned is beyond me. Banning doesn't matter to me. If your post sucks, I simply delete it.

BIG BAD BOB! BANNING IS BENEATH THE ALMIGHTY BOB BUT DELETING ISN'T.

Civil debate is what we want. So if your posts were deleted, they weren't civil or they were simply written to stir or cut someone down.

LIKE YOUR POSTS BOB?

I don't need to ban you.

YOU SEEM FASCINATED WITH THIS. BESIDES DUDE IS RIGHT, WE CAN TROLL ON YOUR SITE ANYTIME WE WANT!

Actually, Charlene seems to have the happy trigger on the ban button.

CHARLENE, YOUR IMAGINARY FRIEND BOB?

And believe it or not, I like the Bob Freeman for school board sign. THAT is funny.... (but I'm not running)

IT'S PARODY BOB. YOU ARE A MONUMENTAL JOKE BUT WORTHY OF PARODY I MUST ADMIT!

THE REPUGNANT said...

Illiterate Jeremy has "problems" with The Republic? You mean, like reading it? ROFLMAO These comments are the best. Keep talking Bob. Promise you will never shut up, please!

Anonymous said...

Re: "I recommend adding Lucy, one of your more intelligent commenters, as a moderator since you, Jeremy, and Herman act like one moderator."

I don't think you're very familiar with 'Lucy'.
That woman is a Scatterbrain...yes, with a capital S.

Having her as a moderator would only add to the train wreck that already exists.

If anyone thinks that Bob is mentally deficient, you would think that Bob was a PhD. compared to Lucy.

She is 3 sandwiches shy of a picnic.

Anonymous said...

Bob Freeman wrote on Columbuzzed: "I eluded earlier to Jim Jones and David Koresh."

Bob, if you're going to use bigger words than 'cat, and 'dog', you should look up the definition, usage, and spelling.

The word is ALLUDED, dimwit.

It's no wonder you're just a janitor.

Anonymous said...

RAMBLING BOB IS AT IT AGAIN:

Bob Freeman on 17 December, 2010 06:06:14

Thanks Misty.

BOB'S NEW BED-PAL!

But we need to consider the source. I think it's just a bunch of drunks and meth heads that act like 12 year olds....

I AM NOT A METH HEAD OR A DRUNK! I SUSPECT BOB IS A METH HEAD AS HE SEEMS TO KNOW A LOT ABOUT IT. MAYBE WE CAN POST A PICTURE HERE SOON OF BOB DOING A LINE OF METH. I HAVE BEEN TOLD THERE ARE SOME!

AS FOR 12 YEAR OLDS. AT LEAST WE CAN SPELL, USE PROPER GRAMMAR AND PUT TOGETHER COMPLETE SENTENCES.

And again, NO, we will not post the link to their website. They can't handle the 4 people that go there to read now.

WHO CARES HOW MANY PEOPLE READ THIS AS LONG AS YOU READ IT LARD ASS! THAT'S REALLY ALL I CARE ABOUT.

YOU A RETARD BOB. A STUPID RETARD. PROVE ME WRONG! YOU CANT!

HATES BOBS GUTS said...

Your problem Bob is that you are a mean SOB. That's pretty much it. Now you are running your board with trustee trash backing you up. That's pretty funny!

Dude (NOT Jeff Barkes) said...

"I don't think you're very familiar with 'Lucy'."

But at least she calls Bob out when he acts like a child. She called him out on the offensive pictures he posted and I believe she also complained that the moderators don't follow their own usage policy.

Anonymous said...

Bob never listens to Lucy, he just patronizes her, as if she was his cat.
He plays her, because he can't play many, and she's so easy to fool and manipulate.