More Insanity From Bob

"Some idiots think making statements of fact is inciting violence."

What statements of fact?  Don't you mean opinion?  Oh yeah, I forgot, you can't tell the difference.

"Some people on a blog that hardly nobody reads have once again accused me of inciting violence."

But you read it Bob.  And why write an entire article about it if "nobody" reads it?

"The same group of idiots that have threatened my wife and dog, and threatened bodily harm to one of our posters, Lucy, in the past, are accusing me of inciting violence. One of the posters on the blog is known to be one of the trustees sons, Jeff."

I have never threatened Lucy, Bob, his wife, or dog.  It's not the dog's fault that Bob is his master.

"Commenter on this website, Truth Seeker, posted this comment last night. It was approved by someone on our staff while I was away from the computer."

And the comment is still there.

"But the office is selective. Apparently it's who you know and probably who you blow that determines who gets help there."

More civility from Bob.

"I think it's time that we start naming names of people who get help every single month. Maybe people we know that get help even though they work part time, have no kids, or simply are females. Maybe we should list the names of known drug dealers who get help on a regular basis. That might be fun."

Good luck with that.

"The same group of idiots that make the inciting accusation here, also accused me of the same thing with the funeral story.
http://columbus1.ath.cx/index.php?news=5046
That's the story we had on here about how Sandra Barkes, office manager and wife of the trustee, reportedly went to a funeral acting stupid.
She reportedly went to a funeral that the trustee paid for and asked mourners there why they didn't pay for it and she reportedy announced to everyone there that she was there to make sure the family got what the trustee's office paid for.
In the comments that followed that story, I said that someone should have knocked her on her ass when she did it. And I stand by that opinion.

Notice Bob says "reportedly" and then says "when she did it".

"I was accused by the idiots of inciting violence. How do you incite violence at an event that happened 6 months ago? And if someone had knocked her on her ass, as I feel they should have done, wouldn't SHE be the one inciting the violence by acting a fool at a funeral?"

So Bob, since you always act like a fool, does that mean everyone has a right to "knock you on your ass" at any time?

"She runs a local elected office and she does THAT at a funeral? I'd say that's incitement."

You forgot to write "reportedly".

"It would have been real sweet if some of the ladies at the funeral would have jumped on her and beat the crap out of her, then she was charged with inciting violence on herself. And no, I don't condone violence against a lady."

It sure sounds like you're condoning violence against a lady.

"But if she did what they say she did, she sure as hell wasn't being a lady."

If.

"She was wrong, and she sure had it coming."

Sounds like inciting violence again.  And you also forgot "reportedly" again.

"If she had done it at a funeral for someone in my family, I can guarantee you that several of the women in attendance would have gladly shown her the floor, err the door."

Inciting violence again.

I state facts and all they want to do is deny what is plain as day and attack me for voicing my opinion.

So Bob, I'm confused.  Which is it?  Facts or opinion?  Oh yeah, I keep forgetting.  You consider your opinion facts.  Silly me.

They THREATEN violence and accuse me of INCITING violence. Hmmm.

I have never threatened violence but you have definitely threatened and incited violence.